Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Bu konu kilitlenmiştir. 
Tartışma Kuralları ve Yönergeleri
Bu iletiyi bildir
and also, why not?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CZpMesjnYM
Actually i don't but i'd imagine that the first try won't be succesfull you know. can't guarantee that tho there's still hope for y'all i guess. Isolationg pieces of DNA doesn't seem easy at all.
Because of predominantly the very American way of cult of personality, gullible people think he's the new messaih, and saly he's a complete buffoon when it comes to many things, but ESPECIALLY science. He is below what a secondary school child is in many ways.
Go look up Hyperloop and his absolute ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ideas there.
It ain't going to happen - I get the joke, but anyone who takes this and him seriously needs their bumps felt.
That's a stupid assertion frankly.
He didn't just have an idea for a start. The idea was over a hundred years old and had been realised it was impoosible back at the turn of the PREVIOUS century.
Yes, all things start with a dream. But that's dishonestly shifting the claim. He PUBLICLY stated it it could work (it CANNOT) and got FUNDING for it. And still adds and pursues stupid ideas.
You're not understanding the problem here. YOU CANNOT break the basic laws of physics, and a simple minute of exploration was have made even a schoolchild realise it's impossible. That's what the problem is - not the hare-brained idea - the fact that he ran with it, people sniffed his farts and proclaimed him as the new messaih and he got funding and has wasted all that because he's illogical and idiotic.
You CANNOT have a bloody masssive vacuum tube. It would never also conform to any safety standard. Any construction person knows about expansion of metals - how do you seal any tube when you have expansion? YOu cannot for this purpose.
You see - it's bloody obvious to anyone else, yet this clown keeps on prmising nonsense.
And that's the problem. You're conflating two separate thigns.
It's just inconceivable, and i don't say that as a weeb but as a furry.
Thing is, the topic subject is about making something from multimedia (specifically anime) in real life so I'd say I'm more-so drawing from my experience & knowledge of real life.
I was actually just going to leave my in-topic commentary at this:
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/12/4300317773579330845/?ctp=11#c3119273879045619657
...a simple one-liner about the ethical issues it entails. ...but then someone who I don't want to just ignore started responding to me & I felt compelled to give him a response addressing some of the points he brought up.
We could just chalk-it all up to "haha, dumb comment by rich guy" (really, though, he may have just been joking but... the support his comment is receiving, in favor of it, contains a lot of people who are not) or "anime is entertaining so catgirls good" but the implications of willing it into the real-world are actually much more significant.
That's a bold claim for someone who demands evidence for one simply saying that something -might- be possible (& re-framing it as though what was said were actually that it would definitely be doable when what was said is that people would definitely TRY if they could), which leaves me wondering where your evidence of that claim, of yours, about Americans is.
As an American, I know that this is an issue in America, one that's significant (& troublesome) & hard to overlook, but I question whether it's truly "predominantly the American way". It's not like what you describe is isolated to America but you're claiming it's predominant.
So, maybe take your own advice and include what distinguishes this as a -justified- generalization (basic epistemology, right?), instead of it just being an over-reaching bias towards an entire nationality based off of unevidenced preponderance.
...and your claim does direct bias towards an entire nationality as your claim includes no information on how to discern which Americans are NOT like that (baseless preponderance) (thus it implies that it should just be expected of any one of them).