NATO vs BRICS

[ChickenTacos]

"Oh, they're not the same thing!"

They are both formidable contenders for world power. Think modern-age Allies vs. Axis powers. Both vying for domination.

[Le fishe au chocolat]

It's more like G7 vs. BRICS, the conflict between two big economic groups.

[Le fishe au chocolat]

BRICS countries have bigger market, but G7 countries are wealthier (so far).

[☎need4naiim☎]

Do you want to end victorious?

Choose

[Soft Wumbo]

white power vs um...

[Enigmatic]

Halliburton poisoned American troops while they were stationed overseas.

[Vertigo]

引用自 IndridCold：

... something, something, outside reality ...

😂

[Rio]

Nato "We want a world that answers to one country, that follows western values."

Brics "We want a multi-polar world, where we aren't sanctioned into the ground by one country, we don't want to be woke."

[Cinnamoon_dragon]

BRICS is not a military alliance like NATO

[Vertigo]

引用自 IndridCold：

引用自 Vertigo：

😂

Just because what I have stated collides with your mainstream narrative built opinion, does not mean its not reality.

In fact, everything I said you could confirm yourself by googling online and being able to read sources in more than just English. But no worries, many people follow the narrative and won't bother to educate themselves. Its too challenging for most to go against what they are familiar with.

PS: I just noticed now that you are on my block list. Not surprised why.

"GoOGLe It yOuRsElF!!!111!!"

Funny how people like you, never ever are capable of delivering any proof of what they claim...

Well, anyone with more than 3 braincells, knows exactly why

Your behind is not a credibil source

Oh and If I'm on your block list, then you should't see my posts...
That's kind of the point of it, but you seem to be confused a lot.

[crunchyfrog]

BRICS is an absolute joke. Regardles of whether NATO exists. But NATO has proven itself over the years for good and ill.

BRICS is a joke for several reasons.

It's well documented that the Belt and Road initiative is a scam. China promises to come to a country to "help them out" for the mere exchange of say, access to your local resources. A fair trade of things.

Except it NEVER works out like that. What actually happens is that China comes in, builds a few cha bu duo constructions that fall down or are useless within a couple of years, and take shed loads of natural resources. Worse than that they promise that such resource mining (etc) will bring in jobs, but they ship in their own Chinese workers then piss off when they've had enough. Leaving the resources gone and just the failing cha bu duo constructions.

There's many Afriacan countries that found this out the hard way as have Italy who have now left.

Sure, more will sign up and be disappointed. But lok at those that are interested - they're a bit hgih on the dictatorship scale themselves. Or desperate.

Sadly the people will suffer as usual.

In short it's a garbage raping of countries by the CCP.

[crunchyfrog]

引用自 IndridCold：

引用自 crunchyfrog：

BRICS is an absolute joke. Regardles of whether NATO exists. But NATO has proven itself over the years for good and ill.

BRICS is a joke for several reasons.

It's well documented that the Belt and Road initiative is a scam. China promises to come to a country to "help them out" for the mere exchange of say, access to your local resources. A fair trade of things.

Except it NEVER works out like that. What actually happens is that China comes in, builds a few cha bu duo constructions that fall down or are useless within a couple of years, and take shed loads of natural resources. Worse than that they promise that such resource mining (etc) will bring in jobs, but they ship in their own Chinese workers then piss off when they've had enough. Leaving the resources gone and just the failing cha bu duo constructions.

There's many Afriacan countries that found this out the hard way as have Italy who have now left.

Sure, more will sign up and be disappointed. But lok at those that are interested - they're a bit hgih on the dictatorship scale themselves. Or desperate.

Sadly the people will suffer as usual.

In short it's a garbage raping of countries by the CCP.

Provide evidence how NATO has proven itself. So far I see only failed campaigns such as Afghanistan and Kosovo as well as a war mongering pact that drags nations into misery and creates puppet states.

I don't need to as that's not the point. I said they've done stuff for good and ill. Did you not see that?

I'm only claiming that Brics is a joke as it's well documented.

Nice try to twist the burden of proof as you still haven't grasped it. Maybe read that link I gave you again.

[Funky Monk]

So, are we getting the final instalment of the trilogy soon?

[Vote Quimby]

Well western countries has robbed Asia and Africa for several centuries, and now the world is sick of the west.

Was actualy quite fun to see France being kicked out of Mali and N-I-G-E-R, then Macron went to Kazakhstan to talk about Uranium, and was being told that "go talk to Russia about Uranium". Sorry but Africa don't wants to be robbed by west anymore...

It is a good change, west should have way less power than now.

[☎need4naiim☎]

引用自 IndridCold：

引用自 ChickenTacos：

"Oh, they're not the same thing!"

They are both formidable contenders for world power. Think modern-age Allies vs. Axis powers. Both vying for domination.

NATO is not only standing against BRICS but also against CIS.

And economically as well as militarily speaking, NATO stands no chance against BRICS and CIS states as we can already see.

" Superior " NATO technology, training and advisory as well as intelligence has not done much in Ukraine so far but slow the Russian invasion down a little, while they are still factually making actual progress, all supported by their very own economy and military, now imagine if all BRICS and CIS states would get involved same as entire NATO supports Ukraine already but does not manage anything but produce dead bodies.


NATO got its a.. kicked in Afghanistan, the US in Vietnam and somewhat in Korea and other NATO countries are right now getting kicked out of African countries and have to end their so called " Counter-Terrorist missions ".

Regarding economy, we are lost without China and India and without ressources from the Russia and numerous pro-Russian African nations. We already feel that in our daily lives by prices spiking madly, huge waves of asylum seekers overwhelming our social welfare systems (for European NATO states that is) and governments crumbling away due to people get into rage more and more, voting for right-wing governments that also happen to be mostly pro-Russian.

Numbers don't lie nor do facts, no matter what media tries to " create ".

So no, one is more formidable than the other and one has actual power, the other just has an angry military covering for them.

During 1943, it looked as if Allies were about to be defeated.

The thing United States does good is NOT how it battles, but how it hides the most fundamental factor until the very end.

So United States <<once again>> makes "its primary adversaries" look as if "they are very tough to beat, almost invincible". As in classic Hollywood movies.

Some people await for some type of "Stalingrad turnaround" before an actual war starts. No, it doesn't happen. That's why NATO let Russia to take over Crimea back in 2014. Nowadays, Russia is busy losing their best ships in the strategic Black Sea one by one.

It was a trap and Russia took the bait. And it can't get out of it. Because United States (Pentagon) wants to make Russia occupied within Ukraine lands until Sorry, folks. This is confidential information.

[Vertigo]

引用自 IndridCold：

Provide evidence how NATO has proven itself. So far I see only failed campaigns such as Afghanistan and Kosovo as well as a war mongering pact that drags nations into misery and creates puppet states.

Ah... The guy who never provides ANY evidence, now wants evidence!

Isn't he cute?