Do you think internet is natural?

[Bomb Shot]

I think internet is a part of nature.
Like a natural internet.

[crunchyfrog]

pb の投稿を引用：

internet accelerates natural process of communication so it can be called natural, a synthetic thing might be something that isn't there at all like for example if we got new abilities of unnatural kind, i cant even imagine which ones, like something that is not present in nature. ability to "slip back in time or smth" what a machine intellect would do which is not present in nature.

No it can't be called natural absent of any further description. Because that implies part of nature and that's incorrect.

Now if you change that to say "a natural evolution of human invention" then sure.

[MEGA MAN]

crunchyfrog の投稿を引用：

pb の投稿を引用：

internet accelerates natural process of communication so it can be called natural, a synthetic thing might be something that isn't there at all like for example if we got new abilities of unnatural kind, i cant even imagine which ones, like something that is not present in nature. ability to "slip back in time or smth" what a machine intellect would do which is not present in nature.

No it can't be called natural absent of any further description. Because that implies part of nature and that's incorrect.

Now if you change that to say "a natural evolution of human invention" then sure.

and here we go again, twisting some random words to seem 1up and more right as others mr boomer, while nothing verbally with sense or worth was provided, so annoying yikes. if u are right with that i would apologize, but imo what uve said makes SUB-ZERO sense lol, sry.

for real: somehow u can only twist what others have said? can u provide any OWN thought or theory or any proof to this thematic, except krippling other peoples texts and playing the red pen teacher from our deepest elementary-schoolclass-nightmares? holy moly halleluja jesus christ mother maria in heaven! -.-*dropping the mouse before my carotid artery bursts*

[MEGA MAN]

Plaid の投稿を引用：

pb の投稿を引用：

... like something that is not present in nature.

you mean, like, the internet?

well u may think theres nothing like the internet but we clearly just dont know maybe - mushrooms for example useing an internet like biological connected messageing system to send messages to each other and trees n stuff - its all already there, just copied again and again and again. but i guess i throw pearls into the void lmao

[crunchyfrog]

Duck around and find out の投稿を引用：

crunchyfrog の投稿を引用：

No it can't be called natural absent of any further description. Because that implies part of nature and that's incorrect.

Now if you change that to say "a natural evolution of human invention" then sure.

and here we go again, twisting some random words to seem 1up and more right as others mr boomer, while nothing verbally with sense or worth was provided, so annoying yikes. if u are right with that i would apologize, but imo what uve said makes SUB-ZERO sense lol, sry.

for real: somehow u can only twist what others have said? can u provide any OWN thought or theory or any proof to this thematic, except krippling other peoples texts and playing the red pen teacher from our deepest elementary-schoolclass-nightmares? holy moly halleluja jesus christ mother maria in heaven! -.-*dropping the mouse before my carotid artery bursts*

Noe that's not how burden of proof works. You're doign EXACTLY what I said.

When YOU Make a claim you need to back it up with evidence if asked. You dodged when asked, and claimed you've done it already but cannot for some weird reason post a simple link or number of post where you've done this.

This shows you are dishonest and are LYING.


I'm sorry you don't understand burden of proof, but the claimant ALWAYS has burden of proof. ALWAYS. No exceptions ever.

And if they choose not to, dodge or play dishonest then the claim MUST be dismissed as utter bollocks.

That's how reality works whether you like it or not.

[MEGA MAN]

crunchyfrog の投稿を引用：

Duck around and find out の投稿を引用：

and here we go again, twisting some random words to seem 1up and more right as others mr boomer, while nothing verbally with sense or worth was provided, so annoying yikes. if u are right with that i would apologize, but imo what uve said makes SUB-ZERO sense lol, sry.

for real: somehow u can only twist what others have said? can u provide any OWN thought or theory or any proof to this thematic, except krippling other peoples texts and playing the red pen teacher from our deepest elementary-schoolclass-nightmares? holy moly halleluja jesus christ mother maria in heaven! -.-*dropping the mouse before my carotid artery bursts*

Noe that's not how burden of proof works. You're doign EXACTLY what I said.

When YOU Make a claim you need to back it up with evidence if asked. You dodged when asked, and claimed you've done it already but cannot for some weird reason post a simple link or number of post where you've done this.

This shows you are dishonest and are LYING.


I'm sorry you don't understand burden of proof, but the claimant ALWAYS has burden of proof. ALWAYS. No exceptions ever.

And if they choose not to, dodge or play dishonest then the claim MUST be dismissed as utter bollocks.

That's how reality works whether you like it or not.

well u dont understand how it seems, i dont proof anything here but we speculate - anything u did was krippling a well written text from a guy. and your written stuff makes zero sense sry. everything i please you is to provide own ideas or found information, instead bashing others lol. but if im wrong here and i clearly dont realize bec. of whatever or my own confusion, then fine. here i apologize to u (seriously) even when im not sure if i should -.-* and from now on i try to bash u less too and try to respect your written stuff even when it makes no sense to me. <3 im sry just for the sake of peace now -.-*

[crunchyfrog]

Duck around and find out の投稿を引用：

crunchyfrog の投稿を引用：

Noe that's not how burden of proof works. You're doign EXACTLY what I said.

When YOU Make a claim you need to back it up with evidence if asked. You dodged when asked, and claimed you've done it already but cannot for some weird reason post a simple link or number of post where you've done this.

This shows you are dishonest and are LYING.


I'm sorry you don't understand burden of proof, but the claimant ALWAYS has burden of proof. ALWAYS. No exceptions ever.

And if they choose not to, dodge or play dishonest then the claim MUST be dismissed as utter bollocks.

That's how reality works whether you like it or not.

well u dont understand how it seems, i dont proof anything here but we speculate - anything u did was krippling a well written text from a guy. and your written stuff makes zero sense sry. everything i please you is to provide own ideas or found information, instead bashing others lol. but if im wrong here and i clearly dont realize bec. of whatever or my own confusion, then fine. here i apologize to u (seriously) even when im not sure if i should -.-* and from now on i try to bash u less too and try to respect your written stuff even when it makes no sense to me. <3

That's because you don't understand how burden of proof works then even though I've explained it already.

The fact is burden of proof works on EVERYTHING WITHOUT EXCEPTION. That's what you're not getting.

So ANYONE when they make a claim they ALWAYS Have bruden of proof.

You claimed I always did these logical fallacies, so I asked you to fulfil your burden of proof where I've done this and you dodged and failed.

So your claim MUST be dismissed as bollcoks.

That's how reality and logic works. By all means google burden of proof and check it out for yourself.

[MEGA MAN]

crunchyfrog の投稿を引用：

Duck around and find out の投稿を引用：

well u dont understand how it seems, i dont proof anything here but we speculate - anything u did was krippling a well written text from a guy. and your written stuff makes zero sense sry. everything i please you is to provide own ideas or found information, instead bashing others lol. but if im wrong here and i clearly dont realize bec. of whatever or my own confusion, then fine. here i apologize to u (seriously) even when im not sure if i should -.-* and from now on i try to bash u less too and try to respect your written stuff even when it makes no sense to me. <3

That's because you don't understand how burden of proof works then even though I've explained it already.

The fact is burden of proof works on EVERYTHING WITHOUT EXCEPTION. That's what you're not getting.

So ANYONE when they make a claim they ALWAYS Have bruden of proof.

You claimed I always did these logical fallacies, so I asked you to fulfil your burden of proof where I've done this and you dodged and failed.

So your claim MUST be dismissed as bollcoks.

That's how reality and logic works. By all means google burden of proof and check it out for yourself.

jeah ok here im with u. except when we speculate and philosophy like crazy, bec. come on. we cant proof our sponteanous speculations at all - it would need hours of video material like a freaking wikileaks library XD but yes i understand u this time. but fine i can send u like 30 vids that "kinda" proofs my point if u want that the next time >.<*

but yes you are right, if i say for example god exist i have to proof it - otherwise its nonesense. . . except for me bec. im agnostic >:P

[BlackBloodGhost]

The internet is human made.

[MEGA MAN]

crunchyfrog の投稿を引用：

Duck around and find out の投稿を引用：

jeah ok here im with u. except when we speculate and philosophy like crazy, bec. come on. we cant proof our sponteanous speculations at all - it would need hours of video material like a freaking wikileaks library XD but yes i understand u this time.

Wrong.

If you make a claim you ALWAYS have burden of proof. If you're saying you can't prove iot, then why on earth did you make the claim I do this and you've offered such proof but coulnd';t point to it>?

This demonstrates you are lying then.


I'm sorry but you're either woefully confused or just trying to wriggle out of this.

Again you asserted I do these logical fallacies. ME. I asked you to show me where, and you both dodged and declined.

So it must be dismissed as bollocks. It's the only way whether you like it or not.

nah come on, just bec. i dont proof something instantly (what should be logic for others maybe) it doenst mean im lying instantly wtf

[crunchyfrog]

Duck around and find out の投稿を引用：

crunchyfrog の投稿を引用：

That's because you don't understand how burden of proof works then even though I've explained it already.

The fact is burden of proof works on EVERYTHING WITHOUT EXCEPTION. That's what you're not getting.

So ANYONE when they make a claim they ALWAYS Have bruden of proof.

You claimed I always did these logical fallacies, so I asked you to fulfil your burden of proof where I've done this and you dodged and failed.

So your claim MUST be dismissed as bollcoks.

That's how reality and logic works. By all means google burden of proof and check it out for yourself.

jeah ok here im with u. except when we speculate and philosophy like crazy, bec. come on. we cant proof our sponteanous speculations at all - it would need hours of video material like a freaking wikileaks library XD but yes i understand u this time. but fine i can send u like 30 vids that "kinda" proofs my point if u want that the next time >.<*

but yes you are right, if i say for example god exist i have to proof it - otherwise its nonesense. . . except for me bec. im agnostic >:P

That's not how burden of proof works and it sounds like you're just trying to make excuses.

All I'm concerned with is the claim you made and I asked evidence for it. You failed, so it must be dismissed.

That's just how ALL reality works.

[MEGA MAN]

crunchyfrog の投稿を引用：

Duck around and find out の投稿を引用：

jeah ok here im with u. except when we speculate and philosophy like crazy, bec. come on. we cant proof our sponteanous speculations at all - it would need hours of video material like a freaking wikileaks library XD but yes i understand u this time. but fine i can send u like 30 vids that "kinda" proofs my point if u want that the next time >.<*

but yes you are right, if i say for example god exist i have to proof it - otherwise its nonesense. . . except for me bec. im agnostic >:P

That's not how burden of proof works and it sounds like you're just trying to make excuses.

All I'm concerned with is the claim you made and I asked evidence for it. You failed, so it must be dismissed.

That's just how ALL reality works.

ok judge crunchyfrog sir *sitting down and giving 1000 yard stare*

[WaifuHunter69]

Bomb Shot の投稿を引用：

I think internet is a part of nature.
Like a natural internet.

We aren't China, but the government does implement policies that change how the Internet is, so it is definitely not natural.

[MEGA MAN]

WaifuHunter69 の投稿を引用：

Bomb Shot の投稿を引用：

I think internet is a part of nature.
Like a natural internet.

We aren't China, but the government does implement policies that change how the Internet is, so it is definitely not natural.

lmao! maybe a virus? >.<*

[DarkCrystalMethod]

The internet is made of cats.

[MEGA MAN]

DarkChrystmasMethod の投稿を引用：

The internet is made of cats.

hmm well they found already viruses hidden in cute kittie pics and gifs tho . . . sus