Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
but but but...
The Logan Paul coin is going to make me MILLINS!!! MILLINS son!!
My point exactly. Thousands of these cryptocurrencies deserve to die because they're predatory and/or pump and dump schemes, but a select few deserve regulation and continued existence because they serve a purpose that no other asset class can exactly replicate. Regulate them and let the free market decide what they're worth. If people want to say they're worth $0 then the free market will let the cards fall and put a valuation of 0 on it, so be it.
We know that Sam Bankman was meant to be the scapegoat because he was setup by smart people around him.
He was on the News which means the government knew about him. Which means what happened was under the watch of big brother.
Millennials who grew up being told they can change the world and then got screwed by the 2008 meltdown decided to try to make alternatives.
The incoming Obama administration's handling the so-called "too big to fail" criminals with kid gloves was certainly a black mark on his record.
Maybe we're thinking different processes when talking about "regulation".
Bitcoin, Ethereum. Maybe a few others, but those are the only ones I'm familiar enough to say aren't. They serve two very different purposes with one ( Bitcoin) acting more of a commodity/insurance akin to something like digital gold. More Bitcoin can't be minted, which sets it apart even from things like the USD.
If we're talking Ponzi schemes then the US Treasury printing $776 Billion between now and January 1st devaluing the USD so it'll make their debt cheaper is the biggest ponzi scheme ever. It's not backed by gold or anything ( but trust in the good ole US of A and who the hell trust s that, really?) and hasn't been for decades. They just devalue it to make it seem like they're paying you more of it while it has less spending power, but still gives them more taxes secured at the end of the day.
Then the other, Ethereum, is a programmable open peer to peer network cryptocurrency that can verify applications codes and is programmable to those applications. through smart contracts . Companies and or individuals can program the cryptocurrency to serve different purposes depending on what they're trying to achieve. It basically can achieve efficiency through financial markets like no other currency otherwise can do.
What were you referencing to when talking about regulation then?
When you have billions, you can afford the best of the best.
Not any of the GOP candidates that have opposed Biden's proposals, but still technically GOP candidates.
Interesting. I wonder what that paper trail looks like.
He literally started advising In-Q-Tel when he was 22 years old, and his "name" is Sam Benjamin Bank Man Fried xD it's the most fake name on earth.
Literally SBBF xD
People think the CIA doesn't even have a single person doing anything.. and if they do then it must be fake.
Anything involving big money is always in part managed by the CIA at the tip top.
You're welcome
I like a challenge, I'll look at more of her photos and see I can lose NNN to her.