Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
It's a graceful sword with an ergonomic grip and blade.
I see where you are coming from.
but personally I find the longbow more charming.
the recurve I tend to link more to barbaric hordes on horseback.
-in draw weight recorves could match longbows.
(even though generally longbows were heavier calibver..150-200kg draw for longbow vs 90-120kg draw for recurves.there was no reason it could not match the heaviest longbows
however it did lack range.. generally only a third from that of a longbow..
so a recurve was a lot more of a close range weapon..
no problem if shooting from horsback.. like mongols did..
but if shooting off a castle wall to armies at 1-2km distance besieging you.. no use..
At point blank maybe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOVJoS80pAA
https://youtu.be/W1bszeudJCE?si=yPd_yeq93aF9g3z8
now fire a nice longbow.. 300-400 pound draw streanght.. wthin 500m with a bodkin plate cutter arror head... would fire trough such a cuiasss
early muskets would not..