Instalar o Steam
Iniciar sessão
|
Idioma
简体中文 (Chinês Simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês Tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol de Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol da América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Brasil)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar problema de tradução
It's a graceful sword with an ergonomic grip and blade.
I see where you are coming from.
but personally I find the longbow more charming.
the recurve I tend to link more to barbaric hordes on horseback.
-in draw weight recorves could match longbows.
(even though generally longbows were heavier calibver..150-200kg draw for longbow vs 90-120kg draw for recurves.there was no reason it could not match the heaviest longbows
however it did lack range.. generally only a third from that of a longbow..
so a recurve was a lot more of a close range weapon..
no problem if shooting from horsback.. like mongols did..
but if shooting off a castle wall to armies at 1-2km distance besieging you.. no use..
At point blank maybe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOVJoS80pAA
https://youtu.be/W1bszeudJCE?si=yPd_yeq93aF9g3z8
now fire a nice longbow.. 300-400 pound draw streanght.. wthin 500m with a bodkin plate cutter arror head... would fire trough such a cuiasss
early muskets would not..