Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
It's a graceful sword with an ergonomic grip and blade.
I see where you are coming from.
but personally I find the longbow more charming.
the recurve I tend to link more to barbaric hordes on horseback.
-in draw weight recorves could match longbows.
(even though generally longbows were heavier calibver..150-200kg draw for longbow vs 90-120kg draw for recurves.there was no reason it could not match the heaviest longbows
however it did lack range.. generally only a third from that of a longbow..
so a recurve was a lot more of a close range weapon..
no problem if shooting from horsback.. like mongols did..
but if shooting off a castle wall to armies at 1-2km distance besieging you.. no use..
At point blank maybe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOVJoS80pAA
https://youtu.be/W1bszeudJCE?si=yPd_yeq93aF9g3z8
now fire a nice longbow.. 300-400 pound draw streanght.. wthin 500m with a bodkin plate cutter arror head... would fire trough such a cuiasss
early muskets would not..