What happend to Disney?

[Arvaos]

What happend to the quality of Disney in recent years?

Marvel is no longer selling out cinemas and no longer can Hollywood rely on big names like Star Wars and Indiana Jones to make the big bucks.

So the question is what happend and how can they become the top dog again?

[kingjames488]

crunchyfrog님이 먼저 게시:

So note that being sued doesn't mean anything at that point.

Anyone can sue anyone at any time. Doesn't make it legit.

NOw if they lose the case, that's a different kettle of fish.

ya, more people should realise that just being charged/sued isn't really significant... it's not that hard to convince 1 idiot of something... that's why the justice system exists.

[Kamiyama]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathleen_Kennedy_(producer)

The woman who ruined Star Wars started her career with E.T. The Extra-terrestrial.

The ET video game was such a flop they gathered up all the game carts and buried them in a desert landfill.

This is like what would happen if Satan became a movie producer.

Somehow she succeed with Jurassic Park. That was a good movie and I have no idea how she managed to pull that off.

[Kamiyama]

Michael Crichton must have carried Kathleen Kennedy through the production of Jurassic Park.

[Your_White_Knight]

kingjames488님이 먼저 게시:

crunchyfrog님이 먼저 게시:

So note that being sued doesn't mean anything at that point.

Anyone can sue anyone at any time. Doesn't make it legit.

NOw if they lose the case, that's a different kettle of fish.

ya, more people should realise that just being charged/sued isn't really significant... it's not that hard to convince 1 idiot of something... that's why the justice system exists.

Oh yes it does... as the fans of sharks say... "the blood is in the water"

One time being sued become two and then three...

Not to mention every time is more money Dismaly has to spend on lawyers and court costs.

They aren't making money but losing as it is... every penny spent is one they never will get back

[kingjames488]

Your_White_Knight님이 먼저 게시:

kingjames488님이 먼저 게시:

ya, more people should realise that just being charged/sued isn't really significant... it's not that hard to convince 1 idiot of something... that's why the justice system exists.

Oh yes it does... as the fans of sharks say... "the blood is in the water"

One time being sued become two and then three...

Not to mention every time is more money Dismaly has to spend on lawyers and court costs.

They aren't making money but losing as it is... every penny spent is one they never will get back

or you could just boycott disney...

but oh no, you couldn't watch the mandeloreon!!

also wtf is that? (a cross between a man and a delorean?)[i.redd.it]

[EpirusWarriorμολὼνλαβέ]

https://screenrant.com/the-little-mermaid-remake-box-office-disney-1-billion/

https://www.cartoonbrew.com/feature-film/strange-world-light-box-office-bombs-227881.html


Just recent. They think customers will eat that studio politics and just pay for that. Never learn because they have some money to burn still, until the shareholders leave and they left only with institutional tradings, main share holders and ceos as bag holders.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bag-holder.asp

They so much up with head up their a and boasting of statues they think this they can get away with this and do forever be untounchable.. never mind the fact they just entertainment and the world is changing with many others wanting a peace of the market from china to the new comers in usa market

[Your_White_Knight]

kingjames488님이 먼저 게시:

Your_White_Knight님이 먼저 게시:

Oh yes it does... as the fans of sharks say... "the blood is in the water"

One time being sued become two and then three...

Not to mention every time is more money Dismaly has to spend on lawyers and court costs.

They aren't making money but losing as it is... every penny spent is one they never will get back

or you could just boycott disney...

but oh no, you couldn't watch the mandeloreon!!

Then you actually didn't understand why the company was suing Dismaly... then you just randomly answered without knowing the facts...

Got it..

P.S. - Nobody ~is~ watching The Mandalorian... each season they lose more viewers...

[kingjames488]

Your_White_Knight님이 먼저 게시:

kingjames488님이 먼저 게시:

or you could just boycott disney...

but oh no, you couldn't watch the mandeloreon!!

Then you actually didn't understand why the company was suing Dismaly... then you just randomly answered without knowing the facts...

Got it..

P.S. - Nobody ~is~ watching The Mandalorian... each season they lose more viewers... :winkkit:

funny... I thought this was a discussion... not a court hearing on disney where I need to know all of the facts as they are exactly >.>

[crunchyfrog]

kingjames488님이 먼저 게시:

crunchyfrog님이 먼저 게시:

So note that being sued doesn't mean anything at that point.

Anyone can sue anyone at any time. Doesn't make it legit.

NOw if they lose the case, that's a different kettle of fish.

ya, more people should realise that just being charged/sued isn't really significant... it's not that hard to convince 1 idiot of something... that's why the justice system exists.

Actually you don't even need to convince anyone right at the start.

ANYONE can file a suit for anything at any time.

It's only when a judge reviews it does the need for convincing come to question. There has to be at least SOME standing at that point.

But you're right - even then, it can be almost nothing.

[crunchyfrog]

Your_White_Knight님이 먼저 게시:

kingjames488님이 먼저 게시:

ya, more people should realise that just being charged/sued isn't really significant... it's not that hard to convince 1 idiot of something... that's why the justice system exists.

Oh yes it does... as the fans of sharks say... "the blood is in the water"

One time being sued become two and then three...

Not to mention every time is more money Dismaly has to spend on lawyers and court costs.

They aren't making money but losing as it is... every penny spent is one they never will get back

Wrong.

Again ANYONE can issue a suit for anything.

If I knew your identity (or maybe even if not under some circumstances) I could issue a suit against you and have it served.

It doesn't mean ANYTHING in there is remotely true or viable. It's only when a judge gives it the once over and sees that it has any standing. Even at that point, it's only a basic filter to see that it's not COMPLETELY frivolous.

Even then it just means, "OK you might have a point - let's move forward". Then you go through the preliminaries, discovery and all that and lay the foundations.

If nothing comes forward then, the judge can throw it.

That's what happened when Trump tried in over 60 courts to overthrow the election. He had ZERO evidence and when Rudi Guiliana was asked by judges for such evidence in the very preliminaries I spoke of "he confessed to having nothing" - and that's why they were thrown out.

The point there is to show you no, it means nothing until the evidence comes forward and that ain't yet.

[Birds]

They're nazis and face the usual barriers to success in an open market that nazis tend to face.

Namely, the fact that not everyone's a nazi.

[Talby]

^ agree all the attempted convictions against #45 were bunk in the past and rightfully dropped. These new "charges" are just the same old thing. The saddest distraction nowadays to distract and take attention away hunter and joe bribem are "LOOK UFOs"

[Your_White_Knight]

kingjames488님이 먼저 게시:

Your_White_Knight님이 먼저 게시:

Then you actually didn't understand why the company was suing Dismaly... then you just randomly answered without knowing the facts...

Got it..

P.S. - Nobody ~is~ watching The Mandalorian... each season they lose more viewers...

funny... I thought this was a discussion... not a court hearing on disney where I need to know all of the facts as they are exactly >.>

Funny... I thought discussions need to be about facts... not "feelings"

Unless one doesn't actually ~want~ to know but just wants an echo chamber of fantasy...

[Your_White_Knight]

crunchyfrog님이 먼저 게시:

Your_White_Knight님이 먼저 게시:

Oh yes it does... as the fans of sharks say... "the blood is in the water"

One time being sued become two and then three...

Not to mention every time is more money Dismaly has to spend on lawyers and court costs.

They aren't making money but losing as it is... every penny spent is one they never will get back

Wrong.
Again ANYONE can issue a suit for anything.
If I knew your identity (or maybe even if not under some circumstances) I could issue a suit against you and have it served.
It doesn't mean ANYTHING in there is remotely true or viable. It's only when a judge gives it the once over and sees that it has any standing. Even at that point, it's only a basic filter to see that it's not COMPLETELY frivolous.
Even then it just means, "OK you might have a point - let's move forward". Then you go through the preliminaries, discovery and all that and lay the foundations.
If nothing comes forward then, the judge can throw it.
That's what happened when Trump tried in over 60 courts to overthrow the election. He had ZERO evidence and when Rudi Guiliana was asked by judges for such evidence in the very preliminaries I spoke of "he confessed to having nothing" - and that's why they were thrown out.
The point there is to show you no, it means nothing until the evidence comes forward and that ain't yet.

Wrong as always... it costs money as it goes through court that's the point. Money Dismaly has less and less of... just fighting it in court is just another drain on their already weakening source of money coming in... but keep ignoring the point, that's what you do best.

You wishing about a outcome in Dismaly's favor is beside the point... not to mention Dismaly's army of lawyers that were formidable in the past have pretty much lost their weight in court...

And they're in court... A LOT... and each case costs them more and more money.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/28/disney-florida-desantis-state-lawsuit-ruling-00108828

https://www.clickorlando.com/news/local/2023/07/05/woman-sues-disney-after-monorail-doors-slammed-shut-on-her/

https://www.disneydining.com/class-action-suit-against-disney-shareholders-milestone-disney-plus-bb1/

https://www.thedailybeast.com/scarlett-johansson-takes-disney-to-court-over-black-widow-streaming-release


Oh... and speaking ~OF~ losing in court for Dismaly...

https://insidethemagic.net/2023/07/disney-lawsuit-defeat-lose-billions-nk1/

Noted though you didn't stick to Dismaly but had to go full TDS and mention the orange man just shows you're being disingenuous and trying to make this into "bait" of some sort.

Stick to the facts and stop with the drama... again, that's why I mostly ignore anything you say.

[crunchyfrog]

Talby님이 먼저 게시:

^ agree all the attempted convictions against #45 were bunk in the past and rightfully dropped. These new "charges" are just the same old thing. The saddest distraction nowadays to distract and take attention away hunter and joe bribem are "LOOK UFOs"

Except that's demonstrably wrong.

There's clear evidence for his arraignments. That's documented both in the papers if you cared to read them, and the fact he ADMITTED to his crimes in video and audio.

The case of steraling documents. He openly says on tape that he shouldn't have these and knows it, and shows it to a journalist. He also admits to other crimes.

And they're seen by a hudge - now a judge can be cirrupt or have an agenda, but here's what you don't grasp about law - if that judge IS corrupt then under appeal that means you chave a case to revisit the case, as you can easily prove that. That's why judges always go the extra mile to make sure this doesn't happen and they are often extra fair.

So no you#'re demosntrably wrong.