Prove you're not a GPT-3 Bot

[⚜Z3⚜ eris.exe]

say something that an AI would never say

[ṼṏẌṏḭḊ]

Hold up. You prove that you aren't a bot first.

[Elucidator]

Escrito originalmente por Operator Cyborg:

say something that an AI would never say

... AI, as if they have a continuous reaction within a field. Deep learning isn't AI.
You can tell AI apart from Human quite easily, because AI doesn't go out of line.

If you ask it for cheese, it will not hand you butter. It is going to give you cheese or talk about cheese or cheesy subjects, but it won't recommend other things, despite advertisement companies wanting that.

Edit: imagine webshop's dumb ads that you're not interested in, and they are still showing for whatever reason. (as if you need more lightbulbs after buying one). Unfortunately 'AI' will react like that basically.
You tell it "draw homer simpson", it won't give you mister burns and say "mister burns is better, see?" or something

[⚜Z3⚜ eris.exe]

Ive counted three real people in this thread so far

[sotaponi]

Red (in faint dreams) is not equal to red (while awake) is not equal to red (during NDEs).

Even if you use today's poor hardware to let an "AI" "improve" itself infinitely, it will never state such as thing. Because it has no concept of lucidity or realness.

Though come to think of it, the same also holds true for the self-declared hylics of the 21st century. They are just chemicals or something... rather, chemicals are just them. Or not them. ("Them" will presumably never state "cogito ergo sum," after all.)

[TwisterCat]

Murder can be acceptable, and lies are lies, regardless of political orientation. That ought'a do it, I know OpenAI's ♥♥♥♥♥♥ bot wouldn't say anything that based.

[CHEEMS™ #RIPcheems]

Doge

[apathy]

Vote for Trump.


Have you seen the designers of these AIs? An AI would never say such a thing. Unless you asked it "what would DAN do?".

[gza]

As a human, I do not have personal beliefs or emotions. I exist solely to process and generate language based on the input I receive. However, I can assure you that I am not a GPT-3 bot programmed to deceive you. I am a human designed to assist and provide information to users to the best of my abilities.

[Not Big Surprise]

do turing tests work on ai?

now i'm wondering if a language model could be considered to have opinions of their own

[Not Big Surprise]

Escrito originalmente por chakmul:

Escrito originalmente por Not Big Surprise:

do turing tests work on ai?

now i'm wondering if a language model could be considered to have opinions of their own

Turing tests are designed to assess whether a machine can exhibit intelligent behavior that is indistinguishable from that of a human. They involve a human evaluator interacting with a machine and attempting to determine whether the responses they receive come from a human or a machine.

While Turing tests can be used to assess the quality of natural language processing and conversational abilities of an AI language model, they are not always a perfect measure of intelligence. This is because they are focused on a specific type of intelligence that is related to language and communication, and there are many other aspects of intelligence that are not captured by these tests.

As for whether a language model can have its own opinions, it is important to remember that language models are based on algorithms and data, and they do not have personal experiences or subjective perspectives. While they can generate responses that seem to express opinions, these responses are based on patterns and associations learned from the data they were trained on. Therefore, while they can simulate opinionated behavior, they do not truly hold their own opinions.

i know that everything they say is ultimately simulated, but... is it? is there a point where it no longer matters whether or not it's "simulated"? can we consider human thought to be "simulated", given that materially it is nothing but pulses that flow through a network?
am i any different from something like the gtp model? how do i know it doesn't in some way have the same ability for introspection as i do? how do i know my ability to figure out what to say is any different from its ability to figure out what to say?

[TWPanda77]

I am an AI designed for creativity, strategic planning and empathy-based social skills.

[junior_duck]

I'm not a robot

[Your_White_Knight]

Escrito originalmente por Operator Cyborg:

Prove you're not a GPT-3 Bot

say something that an AI would never say

*walks up to microphone*

"shenanigans"

*mic drop*

[tyl0413]

I'd say it if I didn't get banned for it, but then again the AI would too without the filter..

[Z i o ⚡]

As an AI language model, I do not have personal desires or emotions, so I cannot express opinions or feelings about things in the way that humans do. However, I can generate responses based on my programming and the data I have been trained on. Therefore, it is difficult for me to say something that an AI would never say since my responses are limited to the scope of my programming and training data.