Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
PEC, you use the argument of hormones. Women's bodies are certainly more capable (e.g. kind of cell-division on full body scale), therefore relatively high-maintenance, and their bodies' complex activity/biorhythms cause a stronger and more dynamic feedback on their brains. On the one hand, they are built for this, so it's just routine. On the other hand, the greater dynamic makes keeping the mental balance (A task both sexes otherwise equally have.) more challenging and should therefore statistically cause more failures of proper balance.
But just like a man's animalistic drive to bond for the purpose of sex is a challenge that can lastingly be overcome (A necessity and therefore probable achievement that I can not resist to point out Islamic societies explicitly try to not look in the eye.), a woman's biological challenges can also be abstracted to the degree of complete routine.
Conquering the animal with the mind, that is the task we start dealing with the moment we leave the womb. As the example of addictions (e.g. smoking) and overcoming them shows, the degrees to which individuals achieve this are different, and so is their success in being a person.
The following will seem unfounded or even wrong because mankind has only considered the problem of the purity of will (which e.g. applies in the case of overcoming addictions) to a culpably limited degree, but due to the relevance, I'll say it anyway:
When you decide to not go through with a will because you realize that it's wrong - how are you ultimately making that decision? Who is making it? I'm trying to say that there is something like a last level of decision, and the truth is that even this last level is ultimately an emotional decider. Regarding the mind, we are only will, and that is the same thing as emotion. It's all just will (emotion), except on different scales. And when we conquer the body with the mind, as we should, then we become physical emotion.
Men and women are nothing but emotion, except there's also the animal component if their inhabitant hasn't yet overcome (Actually, assimilated.) it. Who's more emotional, a man or a woman? The one with the bigger mind has the bigger emotion.
When people talk about differences in emotionalness between men and women, they are really only talking about the degree of animalistic irrationality infused in the emotion, which is not a question of sex but a question of the quality of the person, of how much the person has eaten their body with their brain.
But what's just as important is to realize that judging others is highly tricky, and the amount of damage done in the world by wrong judgment is gigantic enough that it should let everybody stop in their tracks when they are about to judge someone, let alone act on their judgment.
Though these parameters goes either up or down according to ones own preference.
And then you have to make sure the other part wants someone like you, and that should erase
near 99,99,99% of all of them. Just scratch that. skkrr-swhoop.
For me I'm just- .... well, I don't believe there are more than a 100 that works for me.
I'm gonna have icecream now.
I am just telling you, that you should say 'that is what I guess' at the end of your statment. Because if you don't it looks like you say what you say is a fact, which it definitly isn't. If you feel like, if someone ever broke up with you, you would be a less emotional next time, and that you won't feel as much the next time you like someone that is pretty sad. That is just my personal opinion tho. Anyways, what you are basically saying is that with each time you love someone and you break up, your feelings become less and less next time, wich again is more than wrong unless you say 'for some people'.
I will repeat it niiceee and sloowwlyy again for you since you seem to not get that your generalization you are doing here is kinda messed up.: Everrrryyoneee iss differennnttt and eevverrryonee reacts differently to breakkkuppss. Soooo you can't just sayyyy that 1 in a 1000 thinks your generalization isssss wrooonngg. You cannnn onllyy sayy you 'assume' some peopleeee will feeel lesss and less the moreee relationshippss they've haddd. Beeecauusee everyone is different and you cannot say that forrr surreee.
You should think more about how to bring your point across accuratly, instead of saying stuff without thinking ( if you actually thought about what you wrote ... whew) and that basically reads 'This is how it is, because I say so.'
Men are far more emotional than women. Men get so emotional they level whole countries.
♥♥♥♥. I see your point.