Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
That's the problem with our culture these days. That's why we're short on men. We expect boys them to learn manliness from women and other kids. Foolishness.
Then what's wrong with putting noobs in a game with pros? You're only going to get so far curb-stomping in-game.
Well Ik i'd be more of a straight answer if I say "Git Gud" lol, but thats only if you want a short answer.
In details, they just need to know how the game works. Even if some that are in a higher level, doesnt mean their gaming experience is the same. Some could experience it more from other games and worked on them on that game.
So in my case, despite me having such a low level in CS GO (one game example), I have shown to do pretty good due to my past game which was Counter Strike 1.6 (The very first Counter Strike). While there were some changes in CS GO, I learned it a bit faster due to sharing some similarity with the original game. So, not every player holds the same experience.
A level 5 can be very dangerous if they have that experience, though depending on the game. CS GO doesnt give you anything except just showing off, and maybe at some point, a requirement for competitive mode.
My point is, you can not get better at a game if you're not being challenged. In the case of a game like CS:GO, you need to be put into a game with people of a higher skill level, otherwise you're never going to become a more skilled player. You'll just be playing against people who do the same tricks over and over because they don't know anything else.
Nobody is perfectly at the same level. Some people improve more quickly which provides challenge to other players.
If this were not true, then nobody would ever improve because there was a point where literally everyone was new.
A. Your team is good even without mics, just a simple same old rush in and reach the objective. Or...
B. Some of your team has mics as well, which helps improve the odds if they are cooperative.
I have my moments where I win and lose, and my K/D isnt perfect, but its a fairly good score. Whether its below or above average. Skill levels in CS GO dont mean anything if you experience it before through past games. Like I said, CS 1.6 was my first CS game and played it before CS GO even was released and back when CS 1.6 was still popular despite Source was made. Everything you need to know about the mechanics of the game, CS 1.6 helped me out through those years. Then I did well in CS GO.
Of course to me, I rarely played CS GO. But I have played it before, which was good of course. I have my reasons, the mechanics are a bit different but its possible to learn it faster after learning from its past games.
(¬_¬)
Please don't read too deep into what i've said. The only thing i'm suggesting here is that how can a person improve in a game if he never fails?
Well, personally there would be no reason to improve if they would never fail. Its like saying if something works, no reason to fix it. In this case, they might play it for fun.
Unless you actually are losing, then you need to start learning which gives you the reason why you need to get better. So in my case, i'm not some undefeated godlike player. I have my losses, and which I learn from my losses and improve myself. Learning new strategies, or just skills which is by learning how the game mechanic works.
So, one thing I can say is there is no such thing as someone that "never fails", they tend to lose one way or another, but learn their losses to the point where they are also undefeatable. Depending on their directions.
No need to say "sorry". My comprehension isn't what you could define as "normal". Regardless, I think I understand what you're saying. Maybe i'm just trying to think of a logical reason to place new players with old ones. At anyrate, thanks for summarizing your last post for me.
But dont think too hard on about new players. Because even at some point I had a rough time fitting in as a new player back then. Its normal. Eventually new players will get better and may actually end up being equal to old players. I've known some that can compete with me and they were new players (previously of course). They get better from time to time, and goes faster if they are active. Some learn fast, some dont.
But I'm glad you found your answer, good to know its helping.
Sorry, my bad.
Some people dont tolerate inexperienced players.
Not your fault, you were asking a simple question.