Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
So I will call him HE, Steve or Dave.
And before you say these are just crazies on the net, well... it is still bad publicity.
Like, what do you think people see from the lgbt the most? That they did something benefitial to society or that this one person ahd a meltdown on twitter about them identifying their gender as a xenomorph?
People are drawn to negativity more than positivity... and crazy people like that will make things seem so much worse than they actually are.
Seriously, swap in something else and see how it sounds. "Remember that being Black is/was/should be about garnering the acceptance of the masses". No it shouldn't. It should be "about" being whatever you want to be.
Cool. Great. Let's further divide and segregate humanity...
I'm done. Humans gonna human... There is no reasoning with such mindsets.
I think the average person doesn't even know said people even exist. They, are for a lack of a better term, probably too "normie" to know about places on the internet where such people are more common. And even so...what does it matter? If someone wants to identify as a frog...it really doesn't hurt anyone. It's a little weird, sure, but so what?
No. In reality, it doesn't hurt the image of the LGBT+ at all. The only people who are really saying anything about it are people who already hold a negative view of LGBT+ people and are just looking for easy, low-hanging fruit to make fun of them and paint them as crazy weirdos who lack a grip on reality. This thread is an easy example of that. Neo-pronouns are easy for them to mock, so all the fish have come and nibbled on the bait.
Off-topic is an extremely masturbatory forum these days, threads like this are made almost everyday and it's mostly just people coming together to gratify themselves by collectively making fun of trans and gay people.
I already find regular, commonplace, pronouns, that everyone is already familiar with (he/him/his, she/her/hers, they/them/theirs, we/us/ours, it/its, this/these, that/those, nobody/no one, everybody/everyone, somebody/someone), to be frustrating / confusing and ambiguous.
I think that these only add to that confusion and serve no practical purpose.
Nearly all pronouns, preferred or not, are a plague upon clear communication.
Even the ones that we can't live without are a scourge.
"Everyone... now did you mean everyone in the world, everyone to ever exist, or just everyone in this room? Oh, everyone in this building except for Fred, got it."
What? "Jonathan"? That's not so bad - it's 3 syllables, so a little wordy / bit of a mouthful, but perfectly easy to pronounce. Heck, if it'll help communicate clearly, I'll even throw in a few more syllables and use someone's full-name designation more frequently, like Teal'C from Stargate does.
Except you don't look at a tomboy with short hair, no makeup, no visible breasts, and a rather masculine build, and think "ah, that's a woman", because visually you won't be able to distinguish / determine that, without them telling you in advance.
So, if you want to go for peak communication when describing a stranger, suspect or "Waldo" to a third-party who is searching (who doesn't know who you are talking about), you'd care more about what they appear to be rather than what they actually are, when choosing your words to describe them.
So, MtF & FtM transgender people would get the opposite gender pronouns and femboys would get called "her" and tomboys would get called "him", because visually, that's all you can discern.
I suppose that's fair but then are you going to believe a person when they tell you that they are male or female and just take it at face-value or are you going to care if they're trans, & therefore "not REALLY a male / female"?
I must wonder how you intend to verify people's genitals without becoming a sex-offender.
Also, the same "if you get mad" dismissal could be said about people calling you "her".
I agree that xenogenders don't have anything to do with gender identity, and shouldn't be a part of the LGBT community.
Ugh.. should i be engaging with this? Like, are you actually interested in some form of debate here or are you just looking to poke holes where no holes existed before so you can perform some gotcha on an internet stranger?
Lgbt people are just people.. and ideally, they should meld right into society as if they were ordinary. Segregating them with made-up terms creates friction where none would exist otherwise. It's pointless and asking for trouble.
can i just say that i love you guys and nothing else?
they deserve to be treated like human beings but a lot of the time, laws towards them are very discriminatory.
It's easier to just shrug and go along with them than try and debate them over it.