Why are UFO sightings always blurry?

[Sir Dookface McFerretballs]

Every time someone says they have hard evidence of a UFO, even the military, the video or picture "Evidence" is always shaky, blurry, fuzzy, out of focus, or so low definition that it might as well be low poly pixel art.

People have 4k and 8k cameras in their pockets with image stabilization, the military has even higher definition tech, yet every time there is so-called proof it looks like a dirt speck on a lens smeared with petroleum jelly on a gameboy pocket camera from the 90s.

Anyone got high definition proof that isn't bad CG or just a light in the dark?

Or do the aliens have the ability to screw with cameras?

Or is it some M.I.B. thing and anyone with proof is "disappeared" or made to forget?

[Your_White_Knight]

Sir Dookface McFerretballs の投稿を引用：

Why are UFO sightings always blurry?

Every time someone says they have hard evidence of a UFO, even the military, the video or picture "Evidence" is always shaky, blurry, fuzzy, out of focus, or so low definition that it might as well be low poly pixel art.

People have 4k and 8k cameras in their pockets with image stabilization, the military has even higher definition tech, yet every time there is so-called proof it looks like a dirt speck on a lens smeared with petroleum jelly on a gameboy pocket camera from the 90s.

Anyone got high definition proof that isn't bad CG or just a light in the dark?

Or do the aliens have the ability to screw with cameras?

Or is it some M.I.B. thing and anyone with proof is "disappeared" or made to forget?

Because there are no such thing...

That's the "UNIDENTIFIED" part of U Flying Object, it's a blurry and fuzzy UNIDENTIFIED flying object people want to believe is a "alien space ship"... and there have been 0% "identified".

[JobeGardener]

NASA has a billion dollar a day spending budget for looking at the sky. Why would anyone hate on someone who does it for free?

[Q-T_3.14.exe]

JobeGardener の投稿を引用：

NASA has a billion dollar a day spending budget for looking at the sky. Why would anyone hate on someone who does it for free?

They don't have a piece of paper for it?

[Devsman]

Pierce Dalton の投稿を引用：

Huh? の投稿を引用：

Alright fine, but there's still no proof of anything super natural going on. Things that are true, there are 1080p-4k+ videos available, but conveniently as I said, UFO sightings don't share the same quality.

Well, if you watch war footage, you'll notice the quality isn't always the best too. Still, wars are very real ;)

Sure but nobody's trying to make up nonsense stories about the existence of this nonsense thing called war and trying to convince people it's real by using a toaster as a camera, intentionally setting it out of focus, shaking it violently while they snap the shot and then zooming it in after the fact so you can't see enough detail to tell it's fake.

[levet.byck]

maybe people should set up cameras inside their refrigerators, if they (ufos) exist in a 4th dimention..

[Pierce Dalton]

Devsman の投稿を引用：

Pierce Dalton の投稿を引用：

Well, if you watch war footage, you'll notice the quality isn't always the best too. Still, wars are very real ;)

Sure but nobody's trying to make up nonsense stories about the existence of this nonsense thing called war and trying to convince people it's real by using a toaster as a camera, intentionally setting it out of focus, shaking it violently while they snap the shot and then zooming it in after the fact so you can't see enough detail to tell it's fake.

If you did watch a high quality crystal clear video of an UFO or even an alien, you would say "meh that's fake". I know this wouldn't convince you :)

So all these complaints about footage quality are futile tbh... no matter what people see they'll say it's fake, edited, etc.

[Lois Griffin]

Sir Dookface McFerretballs の投稿を引用：

Every time someone says they have hard evidence of a UFO, even the military, the video or picture "Evidence" is always shaky, blurry, fuzzy, out of focus, or so low definition that it might as well be low poly pixel art.

People have 4k and 8k cameras in their pockets with image stabilization, the military has even higher definition tech, yet every time there is so-called proof it looks like a dirt speck on a lens smeared with petroleum jelly on a gameboy pocket camera from the 90s.

Anyone got high definition proof that isn't bad CG or just a light in the dark?

Or do the aliens have the ability to screw with cameras?

Or is it some M.I.B. thing and anyone with proof is "disappeared" or made to forget?

because they are fake

[Fiona the Gamer]

They move faster than light speed, that's why our current photo tech can't have a clear picture of one. Not to mention, most are either type omega civilization or type 4 or above on the K scale.

[Daxank]

Because if they weren't they'd be IFO pictures

[Devsman]

Pierce Dalton の投稿を引用：

Devsman の投稿を引用：

Sure but nobody's trying to make up nonsense stories about the existence of this nonsense thing called war and trying to convince people it's real by using a toaster as a camera, intentionally setting it out of focus, shaking it violently while they snap the shot and then zooming it in after the fact so you can't see enough detail to tell it's fake.

If you did watch a high quality crystal clear video of an UFO or even an alien, you would say "meh that's fake". I know this wouldn't convince you :)

So all these complaints about footage quality are futile tbh... no matter what people see they'll say it's fake, edited, etc.

You're damn right I would. I'd probably find it even less believable, tbh.

But the question is why are the photos always blurry, and the answer is, because it's easier to pass it off as real.

[Fumo Bnnuy n Frends]

Sir Dookface McFerretballs の投稿を引用：

Every time someone says they have hard evidence of a UFO, even the military, the video or picture "Evidence" is always shaky, blurry, fuzzy, out of focus, or so low definition that it might as well be low poly pixel art.

People have 4k and 8k cameras in their pockets with image stabilization, the military has even higher definition tech, yet every time there is so-called proof it looks like a dirt speck on a lens smeared with petroleum jelly on a gameboy pocket camera from the 90s.

Anyone got high definition proof that isn't bad CG or just a light in the dark?

Or do the aliens have the ability to screw with cameras?

Or is it some M.I.B. thing and anyone with proof is "disappeared" or made to forget?

1. they're fast

2. they're on the fly so phone cameras and CCTVs are cheaper and more abundant than HD colored and clear cameras running 24/7

3. they're in the air so it's like trying to focus on a fly in a dark room. Literally impossible

4. No one ever brings this up but maybe they got tech or just the tech itself scrambles camera footage. To cloak or b/c of ♥♥♥♥ like nuclear material and magnets messing with other electronics nearby who knows?!?!?

[HypersleepyNaputunia]

i think 3% are really something unexplainable, rest are just seeing what you want see of regular things

[Pierce Dalton]

Devsman の投稿を引用：

Pierce Dalton の投稿を引用：

If you did watch a high quality crystal clear video of an UFO or even an alien, you would say "meh that's fake". I know this wouldn't convince you :)

So all these complaints about footage quality are futile tbh... no matter what people see they'll say it's fake, edited, etc.

You're damn right I would. I'd probably find it even less believable, tbh.

But the question is why are the photos always blurry, and the answer is, because it's easier to pass it off as real.

Well, try taking a photo of a plane miles above Earth and see the results. Commercial aircraft typically fly between 5.9 to 7.2 miles. These UFO's, whatever they are, might be even higher in the sky flying at higher speeds.

[Amuro0079]

Pierce Dalton の投稿を引用：

Devsman の投稿を引用：

Sure but nobody's trying to make up nonsense stories about the existence of this nonsense thing called war and trying to convince people it's real by using a toaster as a camera, intentionally setting it out of focus, shaking it violently while they snap the shot and then zooming it in after the fact so you can't see enough detail to tell it's fake.

If you did watch a high quality crystal clear video of an UFO or even an alien, you would say "meh that's fake". I know this wouldn't convince you :)

So all these complaints about footage quality are futile tbh... no matter what people see they'll say it's fake, edited, etc.

Exactly! People who think it's fake will always find ways to say it's fake. It's an example of confirmation bias. Same for people who believe they're not fake.

[sotaponi]

It's astounding how many hylics in this thread seem entitled to a degree that they appear as demanding to be convinced, instead of said hylics having to prove themselves worthy of being convinced.

In most likelihood, they will still be sceptics enlightened by their own intelligence, also believing in nonsense such as aether theory, all the while others already mingle with 6-dimensional alien princesses on post-physical "planes." (Or even the post-dimensional, meaning post-illusionary, world. That is in a way transcendental of dimensional illusions.)

Do not argue with hylics. They deny themselves having a conscious self/soul. Maybe they don't have one? But, either way, they cannot be helped.

I also tried taking images of extremely distant planes today. It was hard to even get a focus on them. It looked like a white blot. If the shape was different, you'd believe it a cloud. That's with a mid-class smartphone camera released in 2020.