16:10 is the best aspect ratio

[Acetyl]

Whereas 16:9 is cringe (as well as bluepilled). 4:3 is nostalgic and stands in its own category... 16:9 however, is simply an inferior 16:10. Take the red pill, reject 16:9. Bring forth the year of the 16:10 display.

[↑↑↓↓←→←→BASelect]

21:9 is far superior then 16:10.

[Acetyl]

1920x1200 > 1920x1080

[Acetyl]

Originally posted by SnakeFist:

21:9 is far superior then 16:10.

Certainly not.

[↑↑↓↓←→←→BASelect]

3440 x 1440 > 1920x1200

[El'-]

whatever the aspect ratio is, i hate when it comes with a hella thick bezel

[↑↑↓↓←→←→BASelect]

Originally posted by Acetyl:

Originally posted by SnakeFist:

21:9 is far superior then 16:10.

Certainly not.

Certainly is. More pixels per inch means better picture.

[Xor fo xob]

Originally posted by SnakeFist:

Originally posted by Acetyl:

Certainly not.

Certainly is. More pixels per inch means better picture.

old games taking advantage of CRT tv looks poopy on 16:10 modern thingymajig

[lightwo]

Don't many games have inferior compatibility and leave stupid gaps more often? Despite the extra resolution, I prefer 16:9, it's almost guaranteed not to ever leave gaps. Besides, I'd get tired of letterboxing watching 16:9 videos in fullscreen...

[El'-]

Originally posted by Rupika:

I used to have a 19:10 TV it was the old samsung one but I used it as a monitor. It had a TN panel I think. It was okay for a while but it was nothing special.

how much does it cost?

[Acetyl]

Originally posted by lightwo:

Don't many games have inferior compatibility and leave stupid gaps more often? Despite the extra resolution, I prefer 16:9, it's almost guaranteed not to ever leave gaps. Besides, I'd get tired of letterboxing watching 16:9 videos in fullscreen...

16:9 is basically just letterboxing all the time, just with the screen case instead of black bars.

[El'-]

Originally posted by Rupika:

Originally posted by Polaris:

how much does it cost?

Oh nothing these days it was a tv from like 2007 i think. Probably couldn't sell it for 5 bucks these days.

i see, i was looking for a tv ( i dont really care is it a new or a second hand) as long as i can watch tv shows and use it as a monitor

[Mauserich]

I am very satisfied with my 1920 x 1200 display. Good proportion.

[Enterprofilenamehere]

Originally posted by Acetyl:

Whereas 16:9 is cringe (as well as bluepilled). 4:3 is nostalgic and stands in its own category... 16:9 however, is simply an inferior 16:10. Take the red pill, reject 16:9. Bring forth the year of the 16:10 display.

No.

[Acetyl]

Originally posted by Enterprofilenamehere:

Originally posted by Acetyl:

Whereas 16:9 is cringe (as well as bluepilled). 4:3 is nostalgic and stands in its own category... 16:9 however, is simply an inferior 16:10. Take the red pill, reject 16:9. Bring forth the year of the 16:10 display.

No.

Yes.

[Out Of Bubblegum]

16:10 is not good at all if you want to watch a movie or even a current show.

Why don't movie theaters have a square screen?