Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
토론 규칙 및 지침
게시글 신고
I personally have a 12700K and the only Windows version that has run non-virtualized on it is 11. Since the motherboard is advertised as Windows 11 ready the PTT was already enabled in factory default settings.
WSLg basically provides native support for X11 and Wayland GUI applications. No special display drivers have to be installed on the WSL2 (Linux) layer. The Nvidia Windows drivers are enough.
WSL2 lets you choose between Ubuntu, Debian, Kali and openSUSE, but I found Ubuntu to be best for accelerated GUI apps. I don't know if MS are more focused on that distro while developing WSL2 but there's no doubt extreme tux racer (which I used for evaluating each one) had a faster frame rate on Ubuntu.
The newest NVidia drivers have support for WDDM 3.0 included. Used to be you had to install an Nvidia Preview driver. Not any more.
As long as the latest Nvidia game ready (Windows 11) driver is installed then you can literally install a distribution of your choice, install a GUI app with AptGet in the very next step, run it and it just works. No fiddling around with drivers in between these two steps.
https://store.steampowered.com/privacy_agreement/
This... is a pretty darn enlightened Privacy Agreement. It even details the customer's Rights as described in various hallmark laws/regulations in common use around the world. It gives a lot of detailed breakdowns of how a user's privacy is protected beyond the boundaries of the services being provided.
Most of it is typical website/service-provider "speak." Anyone who processes payment information would include a lot of the rest, too. Third-party release is going to be dictated by contract and is fairly straightforward in this policy.
Importantly and surprisingly applicable here, however is that Steam/Valve even admits they are held liable for any abuses committed by a third-party that they knowingly release the info to... And, the overall theme of "protection" is continued, even when describing details like any IPs gathered by Google Analytics are truncated. This is all pretty exceptional stuff, IMO. They could, for instance, just say "F U" and would probably only lose about 3% of their customer base. :)
And, then, the loads of links to third-party agencies, regulations, etc, and an extensive breakdown of a user's "Rights" and how to go about pursuing them as well as what powers enforce them.
Refreshing.
They only have a D in privacy, instead of an E, like pretty much 90% of the website.
Impressive
Interesting.
I read through their entry.
https://tosdr.org/en/service/180
Some of their "checkpoints" are false. For instance, Valve/Steam specifically in the Privacy Statement above, informs users it is liable for inappropriate third-party use of any private information if it knowingly gives that data to a third-party for that use. In Tosdr, they claim the opposite and that no liability is accepted by Valve/Steam.
On non-binding arbitration, there are too many instances of applicable Laws and regulations in the Privacy Statement to make a universal arbitration claim... Some of those are "governments" who have "tanks" that will shoot businesses in the face if they violate certain laws.
"Arbitration" here is according to Privacy Shield:
https://www.privacyshield.gov/welcome
That's a body established by the US and EU concerning privacy and privacy-related data exchange. AFAIK, it's arbitration clause does not and can not possibly involve decisions concerning monetary awards. IOW - It's for "data" and how it's handled, only. So, if you "sue" someone, like Valve, for money, it's not something that can be resolved under PrivacyShield. It'd have to then go to the courts involved, "AFAIK." But, let's say you wanted your data entirely removed from Steam or contest how it's used. IF it involves something outside of Steam's current agreement, then it would be subjected to PrivacyShield and its clauses, AFAIK, just so long as you weren't monetarily suing someone. (I'm not an attorney.)
Some of their bullet-points, though... are stupid.
"This service uses your personal information for many different purposes " - Serriously? LOL? How does a website "pass" that qualificaction? By doing what?
Look at the rest of those entries that have been "failed." Quite a few, like the above, are nonsensical. There are few website pages, let alone sites, that would pass those standards... They're too arbitrarily defined.
And, I noticed they gave "Startpage" a great rating. (All passes or whatever?)
That's questionable...
None of the entries they have given a "pass" to involve inquiry into meta-data analysis and practices, there.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Startpage.com#Merger_and_recent_history
Privacy One Group is owned by... "System!". (The exclamation point is in their trademark.)
http://techrights.org/2019/10/16/startpage-is-surveillance/
https://restoreprivacy.com/startpage-system1-privacy-one-group/
I would be very cautious with Startpage. While it could be attempting to develop predictive algorithms based on search string data and linked behaviors, there's a bit more room there for exploitation. For instance, given enough user activity data and meta-data, it's very possible to identify specific individuals very accurately without having any direct IP/User data. That's the "metadata" debate associated with individual privacy. ie: You can be correctly ID'd without your IP addy being known if someone has access to your behavioral records and can compare them to current metadata. This "could be" what System! is attempting to do and is now using Startpage for in an effort to generate good algorithms. (Getting "real world" data to use to generate these sorts of algorithms is an activity that businesses around the world are competing heavily to find sources for. (Behavioral analysis, even "anonymous" behavior, is big money right now.)
The thing is, though, Steam/Valve doesn't appear to reach beyond its own services or systems and specifically states where and how it takes measures to protect user privacy. Some of the instances of "data sharing" are necessary, like players using the "User your Steam Login" api to log into third-party websites, for example. And, even then, it's a Steam ID, with aunthentication done back at Valve/Steam, AFAIK. (Corrections welcomed) Steam User IDs don't break beyond the NIC wall unless the user has enabled that.
If one reads the Steam Privacy Agreement, there's a lot more protections there going on than anything that website would acknowledge. And, Steam absolutely has to track people's accounts... forum posts... Library contents.. Like many websites, there are certain local tracking features that are absolutely required. Also note - While Steam may use cookies internally, which counts as "tracking," it's not monitoring one's private behavior outside of interacting with the services/website. It IS tracking gameplay, which is a primary activity on the service, and that would "fail" it according to the website you listed.
I'm unsure why that website "tosdr" exists. For instance, it showed Amazon on the front-page, obviously failing. And... there's no way Amazon could function if it "passed" "tosdr's" qualifications. We also all know Amazon tracks anyone, everywhere... But, if it didn't, and just restricted operations to selling junk online and doing absolutely nothing else, it'd likely fail abysmally. Tracking user purchases would fail it, even if it did so in order to communicate those to a shipper.
Is that a meaningful measurement?
I understand why the site exists, but some services cant even allow a user to login without "failing" that website's questions. A ton of those questions just aren't meaningful. I'd be hesitant to place much credibility on its recommendations. In order to be a meaningful answer, the questions have to be.. meaningful in the context in which they're asked.
PS: I am not a Steam Fanboi. I just ain't. I have grown to like the service after being a staunch anti-Steamer from way back. But, I don't "trust" anyone, either. I certainly don't "trust" Steam or Valve. But, if Steam/Valve hold true to the letter and apparent spirit of their Privacy Agreement, it seems to me to be a pretty decent, straighforward, attempt to ensure better privacy than some other operators. Certainly, it's better than Microsoft's, isn't it?
Note: I examined Steam's privacy agreement after reading someone make an assertion that Steam/Vavle's data collection and use of private information may be suspect. I don't see where it is given what is in the Privacy Agreement. If someone has info to the contrary, I'd appreciate knowing it.