Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
And just like that noise, you may or may not get too bothered.
The TL;DR is 'some people don't like music'
The reasoning:
Only more general. As the emotional tantrum is just an analogy. Music is in itself perceived as a tantrum. Because music is perceived as shallow. That is a kind of simulacrum, I guess.
If you think of e.g. Plato type of philosophies, then you could argue that music is a drawing of emotions. Which is then a simulacrum, as opposed to the real thing, much less the ideal form. And a tantrum is also not real, but merely a simulacrum. Both of which is by the OP perceived as annoying as the noise of drill.
Whereas, in addition to this, there should also be real emotions and platonic emotions, I suppose? Whereas the platonic or divine is then post-ego, arguably. Or something along those lines. Divine love. That transcends the ego into a higher dimension. Such a thing.
IDK. I hope I got the gist of it right... (It's very carnal.)
Music is inspiration, energy and literature. It's like reading a book, in a rhythmic audio form. Books aren't from me either, but there's aspects I can extract and resonate with, to the point where that piece of literature becomes a part of who I am. When you listen to a song you can resonate with, it becomes meaningful, and for some, even a form of catharsis.
Like all literature, it ranges from completely abstract, to the most meaningful and deep concepts, whereas a drill is just noise without a definition. Stringing that together with my statement relating to catharsis, I think you could also apply the same argument for human vocals in general, which I think is a very flawed concept, it removes a form of expression, and the receiver of the expression from the equation, whether they can communicate or not.
Then take all of that, relate music vocals to the tone of someone's voice, albeit with optional additional non-human sounds of the instruments, and you have an argument that's autistic on a fundamental level, given how many variations of human tones and emotions exist. To hate all human tones, I could argue, is neurologically divergent, I think I could make a case for that.
This is an amazing testimonial and thank you very much for sharing it.
Have you been truly diagnosed with auditory/musical anhedonia? Have physiological differences in your brain been explored/discovered as with what appears to be common in those with this condition?
I am truly sorry you experience this. Though, I can't then say "it must be agonizing for you" because this is, as you say, the world that you experience. The "loss" someone else would feel here is not the thing that you would feel, not having that kind of experience available to reference in the first place.
I will offer,though, that while music is very common in our everyday lives, it does largely occur without a lot of notice. It's often inconspicuous for those not suffering as you do.
So, would you say that every instance where you are exposed to music is entirely "conspicuous?" In other words, where a friend or others are in the same place, like everyone watching a commercial or youtube vid, do they seem to not notice a song playing in the background while you, for yourself, could not possibly avoid hearing that as anything other than as being as conspicuous as that "neighbor drilling into the wall at 2am?"
You alluded to that "catchy jingle/earworm" issue. That must be maddening and I really do feel bad for you, there. It must be pretty torturous, like some horrible memory you can't scrub from your brain. You get no "feeling of reward" or "emotional triggering/feedback" from it. It's just a sound that only serves to "leave you hanging" and frustrated for no possible beneficial reason.
Please forgive my curiosity! That's one of my own compulsions... It's sometimes a flaw, but I tend to delve deep down the rabbit hole when I'm so very intrigued.
When you're watching a movie and there is background music, but you're really interested in the dialogue or events depicted on the screen, can you find yourself occasionally not being so very sensitive to the background music? Or, does it jar you "awake" in some way, sometime ruining the value you may otherwise find in a particularly dramatic moment? (IOW - Do you find it possible to be distracted enough to not notice there's music playing?)
Is there any occasion you can think of where you were surprised that you were able to ignore the frustrating annoyance of music in the background?
Do "a capalla" performances where there are just lyrical vocals with no instrumental accompaniment disturb you as well?
Note: If you find movies constantly frustrating for you because of the music soundtrack, there are "masters" out there of every single movie, these days, where tracks are isolated. In other words, it's possible to see a popular movie that has the music track removed from it. That wouldn't effect the dialogue or other sounds, either. But, I do not know of how easily available such masters are.
There are youtube channels staffed by studio sound technician professionals that often analyze music and music production to isolate tracks and vocals to yield a very technical critique of the work that was done.
Here's one and I apologize in advance. But, the reason I link it should be clear - You may be able to contact this person or someone like them in order to explore the possibility of actually being able to enjoy a popular movie, if you find you can not due to the ever-present music track being impossible for you to ignore.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDDr6BtrOUQ
(Note: Just maybe note the channel in case you may want to email/contact this person to see what they have to say about the possibility, should you feel it could be beneficial for you.)
Again, thanks so very much for your testimony and insight into this condition.
Get well soon
Thanks for that great post. :)
An example, from the artists themselves:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_QtO0Rhp0w
Sure, it's "Rush" and there are some people out there that will start throwing poo... But, they don't get it, so they don't matter. :)
"Shattering the illusion of integrity..."
Rush had enough power, perhaps one of the few rare bands out there that did, to freely produce what they wanted. And, without consideration of whether or not it could be played on the radio. When the label "asked them," due to the contractual conditions Rush had smartly put in force, to make an album that was more musically favorable for radio, Rush made... "2112." Much like Queen's rebellion with making an operatic Bohemian rhapsody that purposefully made no darn sense, Rush said "screw that and here ya go, you're welcome" with 2112.
It has always been the case that there is a never-ending flood of talented musicians and artists out there. They fall out of the woodwork anytime someone mops the barroom floors. (A bi-yearly event, surely....) And, there's an equal number of them that go deservedly unnoticed, too. The will may be there, but pure desire doesn't always compete well against skill. It helps, though. :)
There's only so much money even the top producers have to get an artist from the bar to the concert hall. And, even then, it may be easier to just... create one. What determines who gets "created into" the next superstar? Luck, really. Just blind luck, sometimes helped by effort, but that only counts for so much.
There is one thing about the contemporary scene that is actually beneficial - There can be artists out there that can get their work out to an appreciative audience and they can actually buy food with the proceeds. No, maybe they won't ever be a superstar. But, they can bypass the conventional Big Label Deal mechanics altogether if they work hard enough and get lucky enough.
I don't listen to music on the radio, anymore. My ears don't like it. There are reasons, there, having to do with a host of issues surrounding one's maturity over time and what one has come to associate with certain types of music. I loath, with great disdain and proud energy, "rap" and "hip-hop." Why? Well, it sucks. But, besides that, the fact that I didn't grow up with it, I never associated with any maturing emotional instincts, and I never encountered it in a way I could pair it with anything beneficial. Not even once. So, all I hear is worthless, untalented, garbage being spewed forth from a speaker that must surely be insulted by having to make such noise audible... Surely, right?
The Record Companies ™ are pretty angry that people may give money to artists directly and they may be missing out on taking their undeserved share from those few artists that can survive without them. That's find by me. If an artist is more empowered to produce what they want, I'm all for it.
Note: Producers, sound-engineers, all those guys... You're right in saying they're the backbone of any well-known artist's produced work. And, yes, they're more treasured if not more valued at any one time than "just another hopeful pop group" that shows up at a studio. But, if forced to make a choice, the label will go with the artist first. That's because they're the cash-cow being milked.