Εγκατάσταση Steam
Σύνδεση
|
Γλώσσα
简体中文 (Απλοποιημένα κινεζικά)
繁體中文 (Παραδοσιακά κινεζικά)
日本語 (Ιαπωνικά)
한국어 (Κορεατικά)
ไทย (Ταϊλανδικά)
Български (Βουλγαρικά)
Čeština (Τσεχικά)
Dansk (Δανικά)
Deutsch (Γερμανικά)
English (Αγγλικά)
Español – España (Ισπανικά – Ισπανία)
Español – Latinoamérica (Ισπανικά – Λατινική Αμερική)
Français (Γαλλικά)
Italiano (Ιταλικά)
Bahasa Indonesia (Ινδονησιακά)
Magyar (Ουγγρικά)
Nederlands (Ολλανδικά)
Norsk (Νορβηγικά)
Polski (Πολωνικά)
Português (Πορτογαλικά – Πορτογαλία)
Português – Brasil (Πορτογαλικά – Βραζιλία)
Română (Ρουμανικά)
Русский (Ρωσικά)
Suomi (Φινλανδικά)
Svenska (Σουηδικά)
Türkçe (Τουρκικά)
Tiếng Việt (Βιετναμικά)
Українська (Ουκρανικά)
Αναφορά προβλήματος μετάφρασης
for starters, we need to know that, if we have two events a and b, the probability of both happening at the same time is a * b
and if we want to know the probability that a doesn't happen, since probability exists in a range from 0 through 1 (1 corresponding to 100%, and 0 being very obvious), we simply have to calculate 1-a
now that that's clear, let's suppose a number h is the probability that a planet holds the properties necessary for carbon-based life, with h∈[0, 1] (h exists in the interval from 0 through 1)
to ask the probability that any of multiple planets complies with h, we need to ask the probability that h doesn't happen in any planets
given a number of planets n, the chance that h doesn't happen in any of them is (1-h)^n
now, we know h ≠ 0, since our planet is blooming with life, and we know h ≠ 1, since many other planets aren't, so h∈(0,1)
then, we can also see that 1-h also exists between 0 and 1, because we're always subtracting something, but never enough to arrive at zero
i wouldn't take the limit, as we can't work off of the assumption of infinite planets, but it is noteworthy that raising any number between 0 and 1 to bigger and bigger powers makes the result smaller and smaller, approaching 0 the bigger the power gets
so yes, with enough planets, the chance of life becomes more likely
and this is only considering carbon-based life– if other ways for life to exist were theorized, those would increase the chances that some planet holds some kind of life
-Is any at our level of intelligence? Probably but it may be hard to recognize at first because of how different it might be.
-Do they have any reason to visit some nameless planet in a relatively bland part of the outer edge of the galaxy with no unique resources to speak of? Probably not.
Until better evidence shows this, it ain't even wroth considering.
Remember, you NEVER have to make a decision one way or the other. The default of "I don't know" is a RIGHT answer.
I'm not sure I get you. I never said aliens were perfect or couldn't run into problems. I was answering to alien sightings supposedly spiking the moment we were utilizing nuclear power, that those aliens might have been investigating what we were up to.
Which could be the case. But if that were the case (and if they weren't having problems with their spaceships) then they could have probably taken a look at things here from greater distance. Because why should they risk getting spotted by us (because if they exist they clearly are trying not to be too obvious about letting us know about them) when they should have the technology to just use a telescope or other remote devices to investigate us and our planet? You think only humans could come up with the idea for such devices?
And if they have had issues with their spacecrafts then I would assume examining us dabbling in nuclear power should be a secondary priority to them, at least to the personnel flying these. Or would you make it a priority to examine an alien race bombing it's own planet if you flew over to them and had technical problems with your own spacecraft?
I don't ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ care what most people do. I only care about fact frankly.
And UFOs are just that unidentified.
Anything more tahn that has insufficuent evidence.
That's it.
When that bridge ios crossed, then we'll talk and not until./ That's the point.
What they PROBABLY did is also moot. I don't care about hypothetics. When someone sees a UFO like myself, it ends at unidentified.Anything more is just illogical.
Well part of the problem is that we simply don't have the technology to discover microbial life with just telescopes. We need to actually go there and we've only landed on 3(afaik) other bodies which aren't the Earth. We've landed on the Moon, Mars and that comet which the Rosetta spacecraft landed on.
Personally I think we'll find microbial life on Mars eventually, probably in the under ground lakes. This would go for any Ice moons like Europa or Enceladus too. I don't think we'll find anything more than bacteria in my lifetime, perhaps for hundreds of years yet.