Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
To quote myself
This applies to all CVT Manufacturers from my own research and experience not just Subaru. Both Nissan/Jatco and Subaru have both been slammed with class-actions worldwide for their shonky handling of this. The design of the push-belt CVT itself is inherently unsuitable for anything larger or more powerful than small economy cars.
I could rant about this for hours, and am more than prepared to if you're willing to listen.
This one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH9q_NflE34
Dunno, a Testarossa? Not exactly affordable, but I like the looks.