What do You Want That is not Real to be Real?

กระดานสนทนาทั้งหมด > ฟอรัม Steam > Off Topic > รายละเอียดกระทู้

qawsrtfvguyhjnmik 1 พ.ย. 2016 @ 3: 06pm

Magic. Bunnies out of hats. And shooting fire out of your palms. But mostly bunnies out of hats.

< >

กำลังแสดง 46-60 จาก 195 ความเห็น

Gaby The Red 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 3: 02pm

National erick day

#46

Johnny-Boy 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 3: 09pm

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Sheridan:
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ketchup:
No, I treat everyone fairly, and I want everyone to have an equal chance in society no matter what sex, gender, orientation, color they have/are, but there are some people out there who want to get rid of the fact that some people are 'he' and others are 'she'. They want to genderfluid everything.
And color - some people are getting 'triggered' when you describe someone as black or yellow or something .... still we let black people STILL make use of the N-word, but other races cannot. (That's also racism btw.)
I'm saying liberals usually tend to unlock everything until we're so unlimited that we are
actually limited. It's problematic.
I still want to call girls 'she, her' and boys 'he, him' but I get yelled at. Thanks obama.
The reason it matters when you refer to someone by gender or race is that you're sort of putting emphasis on that part. You don't feel the need to immediately make it apparent if a person was overweight or not, but for some reason you felt their gender or race was important, showing that you inherently whether you want to or not deeply believe that race and sexual orientation changes people.
Liberally we want to remove toxic masculinity, the notion that women are only allowed to act girly and men are only allowed to be masculine. Just because somebody has a different sex organ doesn't mean you have the right to tell them what they should be like.

And to add, removing all restrictions is what anarchists want. Liberals want the upmost order and fairness, but some rules are just plain superfluous and unfair.
Also, I don't think showing respect to people who still get mistreated even today somehow is a serious, dictatorian limitation.

If you want to discuss this topic further with me, then we should really make a different thread about it since this is thread space we're taking up.

Nah, we don't need a thread for this... maybe. It would just get deleted anyways because we're conversing with longer texts...
But hey, go for it, but don't get surprised.
People should identify as whatever they want, just as long as they understand facts.
Just like how Ben Shapiro 'bodyslammed' Zoey Tur. (watch the video, it's hilarious)
But for me, I want to be called a man. I don't want to be shamed because i'm a heterosexual white cis-man, which the genderfluid community hates. I still want to refer women as women and men as men, according what they look like. What they choose to call themselves for themselves, that's their business. But all this 'hir' terms is BS.
I don't want to be flipped off when I want a girl who shaves her legs, yet I see the feminists scream at me while walking around with raccons attached to their legs...
I don't look down on people, whatever they are, but I still acknowledge the facts.
The facts. THE facts.

#47

RAM AIR IV 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 3: 10pm

National gaming day. Everyone gets to stay home, work and school is off, and all you do all day is be a lazy couch potato and game all day

#48

Johnny-Boy 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 3: 13pm

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย SuperJr45:
National gaming day. Everyone gets to stay home, work and school is off, and all you do all day is be a lazy couch potato and game all day

We have alot of those.

#49

Azza ☠ 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 3: 22pm

The moon landing, that would be pretty cool.

#50

Lil Ghork 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 3: 30pm

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ketchup:
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Sheridan:
The reason it matters when you refer to someone by gender or race is that you're sort of putting emphasis on that part. You don't feel the need to immediately make it apparent if a person was overweight or not, but for some reason you felt their gender or race was important, showing that you inherently whether you want to or not deeply believe that race and sexual orientation changes people.
Liberally we want to remove toxic masculinity, the notion that women are only allowed to act girly and men are only allowed to be masculine. Just because somebody has a different sex organ doesn't mean you have the right to tell them what they should be like.

And to add, removing all restrictions is what anarchists want. Liberals want the upmost order and fairness, but some rules are just plain superfluous and unfair.
Also, I don't think showing respect to people who still get mistreated even today somehow is a serious, dictatorian limitation.

If you want to discuss this topic further with me, then we should really make a different thread about it since this is thread space we're taking up.
Nah, we don't need a thread for this... maybe. It would just get deleted anyways because we're conversing with longer texts...
But hey, go for it, but don't get surprised.
People should identify as whatever they want, just as long as they understand facts.
Just like how Ben Shapiro 'bodyslammed' Zoey Tur. (watch the video, it's hilarious)
But for me, I want to be called a man. I don't want to be shamed because i'm a heterosexual white cis-man, which the genderfluid community hates. I still want to refer women as women and men as men, according what they look like. What they choose to call themselves for themselves, that's their business. But all this 'hir' terms is BS.
I don't want to be flipped off when I want a girl who shaves her legs, yet I see the feminists scream at me while walking around with raccons attached to their legs...
I don't look down on people, whatever they are, but I still acknowledge the facts.
The facts. THE facts.

No feminist (I am one myself) is gonna flip you off for having tastes. It's if you choose to intervene and say "you're doing it wrong" or "you shouldn't be doing that" where you kinda become a tool. You're misunderstanding me on the naming thing. You shouldn't feel the need to say "I wasn't cut off by just any person, I was cut off by a woman" - stuff like that, or "A black guy gave me a nasty look" - it's fine if you describe them, but profiling based on that stuff is where things go awry.

Oh, and you should be ashamed for not accepting transgender on the basis of "we don't understand it well enough" - you choose to not understand it, that's what you're doing. You simplify the human brain so much that you can't accept this totally natural happenstance.

I'm done, I refuse to discuss with someone that close minded.

#51

Johnny-Boy 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 3: 44pm

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Sheridan:
No feminist (I am one myself) is gonna flip you off for having tastes. It's if you choose to intervene and say "you're doing it wrong" or "you shouldn't be doing that" where you kinda become a tool. You're misunderstanding me on the naming thing. You shouldn't feel the need to say "I wasn't cut off by just any person, I was cut off by a woman" - stuff like that, or "A black guy gave me a nasty look" - it's fine if you describe them, but profiling based on that stuff is where things go awry.

Oh, and you should be ashamed for not accepting transgender on the basis of "we don't understand it well enough" - you choose to not understand it, that's what you're doing. You simplify the human brain so much that you can't accept this totally natural happenstance.

I'm done, I refuse to discuss with someone that close minded.

Sigh... this guy...
Look, when a woman snatches the last bottle of butter in the store, I don't hate her because she's a woman. Did I ever imply that? Oh, i'm sorry - let me correct you:
I acknowledge when people are black, woman, taller than me, fatter than me etc but I don't look at these characteristics and think "you are doing this evil thing because you are black." No.
When it comes to transgender people, those who keep refering them as a man, when I can clearly see it's a woman - will still think it's a woman. You think this is wrong? You think I'm going to hell for this thing? I don't care if a person what to dye their hair blue and get bubblecheeks but I will only call a person man or woman, on the basis of their looks if (if I can't take a look down their pants har harr.) I'm not gonna call people 'hir'. Stupid made-up word.
I shouldn't be blamed for this.
I don't hate transexuals either, let me make that clear - but if this transwoman robs a bank and the DNA-police comes up with dna samples that says it's a man -... well, then that's a fact.
Facts don't care about your feelings.
I'm also done, I need smarter people to argue with, that doesn't start fights everywhere. -.-

#52

shad 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 4: 02pm

Less chinese games on the Steam store.

#53

ChaffyExpert 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 4: 12pm

Magic, shooting fire out of your hands, dragons etc... wouldn't it just be easier to say "Anime".

แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย ChaffyExpert; 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 4: 12pm

#54

ChaffyExpert 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 4: 13pm

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย ShadowGaming:
Less chinese games on the Steam store.

what chinese games?

#55

useless Angel 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 4: 13pm

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Traror:
Magic, shooting fire out of your hands, dragons etc... wouldn't it just be easier to say "Anime".

You wouldn't be the main character

#56

useless Angel 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 4: 16pm

man you messed up the quote so hard replying is broken.

#57

ChaffyExpert 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 4: 16pm

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย ✮ Chicken-chan:
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Traror:
Magic, shooting fire out of your hands, dragons etc... wouldn't it just be easier to say "Anime".
You wouldn't be the main character

i tried to understand this.

i failed miserably.

#58

shad 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 4: 23pm

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Traror:
โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย ShadowGaming:
Less chinese games on the Steam store.
what chinese games?

The ones in the new section of the steam store

Edit: The last time I checked the Steam store I saw a bunch of those annoying anima games

I don't know how to spell anima... Lol

แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย shad; 2 พ.ย. 2016 @ 4: 27pm

#59