Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Graphic?
70% realistic + 30% cartoon.
But cartoony is usually more "timeless", if done right.
I love seeing how realistic games can go, with some now being absolutely awe inspiring like Red Dead Redemption 2, where I can forget what I was doing and just end up looking at a sunset or a storm rolling in the distance.
But in all honesty, too many games are trying for "ultra realism" at the cost of actual content and gameplay.
I wish there were more cartoony and timeless games to play.
I could hop into a game of Borderlands 2, or original Ratchet and Clank, 10 years from now and it would still "feel" right... But say a "realistic" game like Ghost Recon Breakpoint or such would likely feel incredibly dated depending on how good realistic graphics have gotten since it was released.
At one point I thought GTA San Andreas on the PS2 was the most realistic graphics... Now it actually looks cartoony.
It depends on the game.... each has it's own place in games graphics....