Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español - España (Spanska - Spanien)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanska - Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (Portugisiska – Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugisiska - Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (Ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
Yeah I said it, where are my edgelords who grew up non-conforming.
I don't mind things changing; the quality of life improvements alone are worth it.
I feel old now. The 80's, pffft.
So much this!
I think people forget great moments like - not having The Gem 85% into Space Quest 1, crouching by a random wall in Castlevania (the early 90s?), or how fast can you pour beer before all your quarters are gone...
But there's absolutely no excuse for not having anything decent to play. There's just so many great games out there, it's easier to run out of time to play great games than out of great games to play.
There are exceptions for sure, but it's not like before when you had multiple great games in just one year.
2020 had Half-Life Alyx, Among us, Ghost of Tsushima, Cloudpunk, Final Fantasy 7 (while a remake, it does a heap of stuff different from the prevoous), Persona 5, Hades, Flight Simulator, Yakuza 0 and I could go on and on. That's multiple great games. 2021 is very young, but already had Hitman 3, Dragon Quest and Little Nightmares 2.
You're either kidding or you're voluntary limiting yourself to heavily marketed A games. In that case, your own fault.
Whether this is good or bad depends on your tastes.
Are you kidding me, 80s video games SUCKED.
Not because of the graphics, but the design. Most of them were really short ( often under an hour) and to raise the lifespan of a game they usually were brutally and unfairly hard.
That was not fun in the 80s and is not more fun nowadays.
While for sure some classic series were born in that time you need to have some MASSIVE Nostalgia Googles to think games in the 80s or 90s was better then nowadays.
The thing is nostalgia is powerful. It's important to realise when you're being biased, and I think you're being biased right now.
It's easy to look at the FIRST games in a genre as breathtaking and wonderful because, well, they're new. Everything's more impressive then.
But that does not mean they are BETTER.
And I am in the lucky position that I don't sell my games or platforms and play them all regularly. From my early kit computers and cassettes to modern day consoles.
And frankly here's a list of why things were ♥♥♥♥♥♥ back then.
Enforced difficulty to mask longeivity.
Too many arcade ports and generic games (something that hasn't changed as there are still every bit as many trend chasers).
Limited memory and capabilities leading to far smaller games which can be completed far quicker.
Limited capabilities resulting in limited scope of games (you can't effectively create a 3D world like minecraft of anything pre-3D).
And so on.
So yeah, there's some great games back then, as there always have been. But you need to be HONEST. If your argument is concerning the state of triple A publishers and risk aversion in the industry, I'm right there with you. But to make sweeping daft assertions that new stuff bad, old stuff good is just laughably disingenious.