Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
back when I lived on a farm most field had a lot's of those giants hay ball all around untill very late in summer.
I don't know much about other places and things probably changed but back in the old days farms here use to primary feed the cows with grass.
I remember the old peoples who used to tell us that in their time fruits where hard to get and they only got things like Orange and Banana like once or maybe twice a year.
That's kinda sad you don't want to answer what I asked.
You need to try better than just deflection or cognitive dissonance.
Egg is undeveloped bird (or some other animal species), chicken lay them daily, so yeah, a fresh egg is like free food, especially if it's unimpregnated.
Fish are very much meat and very much feel pain btw, it's some myth that they don't, but it was a means to justify fish capture and consumption. ("even Jesus ate fish", "fish aren't meat", "fish don't feel pain", etc)
Actually, fish's central nervous system is quite similar to ours.
It's meat.
No, you are the one not trying to have a discussion, thinking that being vegan is somehow guilt-free and good for the environment when it is as bad or worse than the meat industry.
The fact you don't want to acknowledge those questions about clear cutting, GMOs, Pesticides, and billion dollar vegetable and fruit industries being just as evil answers it perfectly for me.
Claiming that the fruit/vegetable industry is worse than the meat industry is a lie.
I'm not a representative for any of those industries, so I can't answer them anyway even if in some pretend world those questions WEREN'T bait questions.
Not sure why anyone would be doing that given that veganism doesn't mean giving up vital nutrients.
This is not logical. If A is better for the environment than B, then whether you own C doesn't change that. Owning a phone and having a more environmentally friendly diet is better for the environment than owning a phone and having a less environmentally friendly diet. You're just arbitrarily telling people not to claim things that... are true?
You're usually quick to note that not everyone is in the same situation; it's not practical for everyone to have a vegan diet etc. And that's all true, and sensible. So why abandon that thinking when it comes to other aspects of our lives? Is it practical for everyone to go without a phone, a computer, a house?
Finally, "don't claim it's better for the environment if you live with modern things such as a phone, house and PC" is completely counterproductive in environmental terms. You say we need collective action, but you, what, want anyone who isn't homeless to stop making environmentally positive changes in their lifestyle?
You know that my argument is based on science with the nutrients and the rise of humankind. You can google it or look up our old locked vegan thread (any of them)
I am saying we need to find solutions, I am willing to accept that eating less meat is one of those btw. Just like I think cutting down on rice paddies is also a good idea or carrot farms. Nuts also are a huge issue (also with our water supply)
Those are based on scientific numbers, they are the most logical.. I can´t know if they are truth, maybe we are all rabbits and only need hay.. maybe we should try that, albeit from a scientific perspective, that is less likely, than my argument.
Vegans lack vital nutrients unless they suppliment up and even then they lack certain nutrients. I am not saying you can´t live without them, but it will impact health, so will eating only meat for that sake.. (then you will also lack vital nutrients)
It is not practical for all of us to own a large modern house. I actually don´t think we need two cars wither (I bike as much as I can, even with my kids to kindergarden etc.) We do own a hybrid car, nothing fancy. I understand that we have put ourself in a situation were we pollute and hold others down to be able to it.
Veganism stems from religion.. it is religious in its origin nature, its based on belief and purification. But even the origin religion is lacto vegans (they drink milk and eat cheese ie) they also eat fish if in need... Those that can afford it and are men (because females can´t achieve total nirvana in that religion) will go to the extremes to get salvation, even going as far as to take on mask to not inhale insects (they are meat as well)
They carefully inspect the road they walk as well, to be certain not to harm small animals and insects. Killing even a fly would be a huge sin... These people could never support modern veggie farms, since they kill more animals than people that just eat beef.
Again.. beliefs are fine.. My argument here was. Do as you want, but don´t claim moral high ground. If you want to actually change the planet and our situation, then we need to do so in unity, we could start with our over population or way of life.
Of course, I can't control whether a company falsely markets their products but, aside from only eating the stuff I grow or visiting a local farm, it's the best we have.
I look for non-GMO, organic, soy free, palm oil free. Companies that are pretty much green.
The chocolate I buy doesn't destroy the rainforest, the chips I buy support the Seed Savers Exchange, etc.
Of course, nobody should be buying the Nabisco right now - they treat their workers like trash and I'm pretty sure they don't give a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ about the environment.