Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
We have to keep it simplified here, else we would have to post scientific papers and explain evertyhing in detail. It was merely a way to talk about energy and the fact we can't fathom much and thus "makes" up constructs to deal with what we don't know.
if it's fake then why do Fake operations work?.
Placebo is a thing?.
Lay of hands never worked for me either. and if you mean the fake surgery in 3rd world where they pull objects out of people to represent negative energy. And that cures people. I wouldn't believe it unless I experienced it personally, on myself. And of course after an actual doctor looked at me over and proclaimed me cured, in writing too. So I could have a material proof.
indeed, because i haven't a clue what has been written before your reply. for the sake of those who wish to contribute, it would be nice if the debate was kept simple enough to understand.
I don't follow metaphysics or religious themes, so my belief is not applicable.
Dreams are real to the dreamer.
https://books.google.nl/books?id=KhBMCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT22&lpg=PT22&dq=faked+operations+curing+patient&source=bl&ots=XJ9dr2Fpgd&sig=ACfU3U2eip1ac4LYKAh_ypkRVb_CqCAn6Q&hl=nl&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiVo_ijr_rpAhVHzKQKHdNqCvUQ6AEwAHoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=faked%20operations%20curing%20patient&f=false
Of course it can. I feel less pain than I should all the time. It doesn't mean anything really. In fact its actually kind of dangerous, I get hurt more often because I don't feel as much pain. Like how I can stay up 3 days and then my body its wrecked. And I can need a recovery period.
I could ignore the carpel tunnel pain, but that just means the damage gets worse. Pain exists for a reason.
One might be able to fully dissociate from physical pain. But I'm not about to try that.
That's my point, that theory doesn't really answer anything and is no different than other theories such as Dualism. Thus, it's up to the observer to choose what is most pleasant to them. Hence, I don't buy into the "Meat Robots" theory because it isn't pleasant to me. I like thinking Humans are something more or have the capacity to be.
And that's fine since Dualism can't really be proven either and is little different to the "Meat Robots" theory. That's why I touched on Religion possibly being a construct designed for people to act a certain way.
The first half of this doesn't really make sense to me. How would you write or click something before you actually became aware of it? Are you referring to thought before action? Or are you referring to instinct? I don't understand how you "did not take the choice actively" when actions such as that aren't reflexive; you need to think about it; however briefly. Unless you are trying to make a cognition argument? Though re-reading it makes it seem like you are trying to make a Consciousness vs Unconsciousness argument... in which case we have a difference in opinion. I tend to favor the Subconscious term as our brains process tons of information at lightning speeds but it doesn't let all that information be the forefront of our attention so as not to overwhelm our higher thought. E.g. to use your analogy; you boot up a game to play but in the background your PC is downloading an update. Your "higher thought" is on the game so you don't notice the Update until you start having performance issues with your game.
As for the "brain in a jar" arguments... there's equal arguments against that as well. That's why, IMO, it comes down to just picking a theory that is most appealing to you. No theory has concrete proof, some just have more circumstantial evidence than others. However, even that evidence is subject to interpretation which then eventually falls into a cognition argument and we are back to Plato's Cave all over again.
Basic critical thinking and scepticism. It's worth believing in when sufficient evidence has been presented. For souls, NO evidence has been presented. Everything that has been offered has been found to be sorely lacking.
So no, nor should anyone.
Its not great to go through your whole life bitter, depressed, or angry. Because you only want to ever be seen as scientific and rational. People already, just are not that.
Belief, is a tool. That can greatly enhance your life. you can throw that away if you want, for sure. But it might leave an empty feeling, or a hopelessness, or anger, etc.
Well, let's break this down.
You have an experience that you can't explain.
There you go- that's as far as you can take it.
If mean me, all I'm saying is, if its ruining your life not having any belief. And having a belief means your life is great. Maybe have the belief.
Just don't hold other people to it. An specially don't hurt people cuz of it.
So you don't believe in music?
Or film?
Or germs?
Or atoms?
Or games?
You know, Music theory, germ theory, atomic theory, game theory, etc.?