Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
History about it: A flat record made between 1858 and the late 1950s is called a "78" by vinyl enthusiasts and collectors. It's called that because the record spins at 78 revolutions per minute. The 78 disc severely limits the length that a song can be, because only so much music can fit onto the disc. The 78 comes in two sizes: a 10-inch that holds three minutes of music and a 12-inch that holds four.
There are bands that wrote songs longer than four minutes even before the music industry switched to CDs. Rush and Jimi Hendrix have both recorded 20-minute-long songs. Pink Floyd, Led Zepplin, and Bob Dylan all have 10-minute songs.
However, that 3-5 minutes per song just stuck. They consider 2:42 being a perfect length for music, as more people are willing to hear it all and stick with it till the next song. I guess it's our short attention spans and the fact we have been feed into that our entire life as the norm. Then if some collector wants an old school vinyl copy, they can also have that.
Now playing "Thank u, next" ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dq4zR3DImJA
If you're looking for longer songs, try some 1970's-era progressive rock - many prog bands have recorded songs that run longer than 10 minutes (on a couple occasions, even as long as 45 minutes!)
What?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47Vz-ptyKbQ
According to whom, and how they determined that, I don't know, but it's been a thing since Billy Joel wrote "The Entertainer".
Maybe its because you are just hearing modern music on the radio?
Most people that listen to modern "music" have no sense about music anyway.
You see they are basically the same song over and over again (they all use the same formula)
They run 440 hz (you can't actually hear all the tones due to this) They all have one of several rythems that have been identified as a easy catch rythem" many of them also "not just due to hz" have very heavy post production effects on them (half the pop musicians sound awful without) almost none of them can play an instrument either.
But that is what the avarage joe wants and its too risky to actually invest in something that might be or might not be popular, that is why you see this trend.. The question to ask however is.. Why do you listen to it in the first place? Are you also a