Why almost every song that comes out is only 3 minutes long

[jose.gonzales.2006]

Title, firstly i thought its only a thing in sh*tty mumble rap but i feel like that every song has to be 3 minutes long, max somewhere below 4 min mark

[Jake]

It all depends on the genre

[jose.gonzales.2006]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย  Kubuszz :

It all depends on the genre

I mean now that i think about it you replay it more times when its shorter so that might be the trick but, sure there are some genres where this doesnt happen that often but rap, pop or something else is pretty full of it

[Azza ☠]

A hit song is usually 3 to 5 minutes long.

History about it: A flat record made between 1858 and the late 1950s is called a "78" by vinyl enthusiasts and collectors. It's called that because the record spins at 78 revolutions per minute. The 78 disc severely limits the length that a song can be, because only so much music can fit onto the disc. The 78 comes in two sizes: a 10-inch that holds three minutes of music and a 12-inch that holds four.

There are bands that wrote songs longer than four minutes even before the music industry switched to CDs. Rush and Jimi Hendrix have both recorded 20-minute-long songs. Pink Floyd, Led Zepplin, and Bob Dylan all have 10-minute songs.

However, that 3-5 minutes per song just stuck. They consider 2:42 being a perfect length for music, as more people are willing to hear it all and stick with it till the next song. I guess it's our short attention spans and the fact we have been feed into that our entire life as the norm. Then if some collector wants an old school vinyl copy, they can also have that.

[󠀡]

^ ok thanks siri

[jose.gonzales.2006]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Azza ☠:

A hit song is usually 3 to 5 minutes long.

History about it: A flat record made between 1858 and the late 1950s is called a "78" by vinyl enthusiasts and collectors. It's called that because the record spins at 78 revolutions per minute. The 78 disc severely limits the length that a song can be, because only so much music can fit onto the disc. The 78 comes in two sizes: a 10-inch that holds three minutes of music and a 12-inch that holds four.

There are bands that wrote songs longer than four minutes even before the music industry switched to CDs. Rush and Jimi Hendrix have both recorded 20-minute-long songs. Pink Floyd, Led Zepplin, and Bob Dylan all have 10-minute songs.

However, that 3-5 minutes per song just stuck. They consider 2:42 being a perfect length for music, as more people are willing to hear it all and stick with it till the next song. I guess it's our short attention spans and the fact we have been feed into that our entire life as the norm.

you are right but you have to agree that 5 minutes is more than 3 .. the 3 mins just kinda pass away too fast without you realizing, i think 5 mins is ideal

[Quint the Alligator Snapper]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Fu2s:

Title, firstly i thought its only a thing in sh*tty mumble rap but i feel like that every song has to be 3 minutes long, max somewhere below 4 min mark

Really? My observations are that popular music songs have gotten longer. Look at the Beatles for example; they had pretty short songs, like 2-3 minutes sometimes, but nowadays we get 4-5 minute songs.

[Azza ☠]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย 󠀡:

^ ok thanks siri

Now playing "Thank u, next" ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dq4zR3DImJA

[TJSlipperman]

Only the ones on Top 40 radio.

If you're looking for longer songs, try some 1970's-era progressive rock - many prog bands have recorded songs that run longer than 10 minutes (on a couple occasions, even as long as 45 minutes!)

[AmsterdamHeavy]

https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2014/08/most-songs-are-three-minutes-long-because-thats-how-most-us-them/

[cSg|mc-Hotsauce]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Fu2s:

Title, firstly i thought its only a thing in sh*tty mumble rap but i feel like that every song has to be 3 minutes long, max somewhere below 4 min mark

What?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47Vz-ptyKbQ

[captainwiseass]

That's the optimal length for radio play.

According to whom, and how they determined that, I don't know, but it's been a thing since Billy Joel wrote "The Entertainer".

[AdahnGorion]

Most of the music I listen to is alot longer, some of them are hours long
Maybe its because you are just hearing modern music on the radio?

[jose.gonzales.2006]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Darkie:

Most of the music I listen to is alot longer, some of them are hours long
Maybe its because you are just hearing modern music on the radio?

I think you didnt get my question right there mate. I wanted to say that modern songs (doesnt matter the genre) are often just 3 mins long, for me ideal lenght is 5 mins, or i just keep playing the whole album: I cant imagine someone enjoying a 3 minute song.. its just passes away too quickly, that was people replay it more.

[AdahnGorion]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Fu2s:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Darkie:

Most of the music I listen to is alot longer, some of them are hours long
Maybe its because you are just hearing modern music on the radio?

I think you didnt get my question right there mate. I wanted to say that modern songs (doesnt matter the genre) are often just 3 mins long, for me ideal lenght is 5 mins, or i just keep playing the whole album: I cant imagine someone enjoying a 3 minute song.. its just passes away too quickly

Most people that listen to modern "music" have no sense about music anyway.
You see they are basically the same song over and over again (they all use the same formula)
They run 440 hz (you can't actually hear all the tones due to this) They all have one of several rythems that have been identified as a easy catch rythem" many of them also "not just due to hz" have very heavy post production effects on them (half the pop musicians sound awful without) almost none of them can play an instrument either.

But that is what the avarage joe wants and its too risky to actually invest in something that might be or might not be popular, that is why you see this trend.. The question to ask however is.. Why do you listen to it in the first place? Are you also a

[slowdeath]

cause it's a good length for songs