安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
此主题已被锁定 
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
It's called a metal detector and already installed in most American schools... students just slip weapons around it (as far as I've seen on tv and the movies).
No, I am not confusing terrorism with a school shooting. I'm displaying how a single individual can be a perpetrator in a mass murder on a terrifying scale without the use of a firearm. If there is a will, there is a way.
Will we ever be rid of senseless violence? Extremely unlikely. Will removing all the tools which aid this prevent it? No. They will only find another tool.
When I was in school, it was bombings. Now its shootings, same game... different tool. Makes ZERO difference until we resolve the root of the issue, instead of putting a bandaid on the symptoms.
No it didn't. The violence was merely transposed to the streets, with different weapons. School gun violence has causality, and that causality is the sense of powerlessness students feel. Why would they have anything else, thrown into a mixture of students with no personal agency?
There are two ways to address this. The first is to simply give students more individual power to choose where their education goes and where it is conducted. Gun violence is lowered in nations besides the US principally because of this. Other nations have more freedom of choice in education, even if it needs parental supervision, and so children are not often put in social circumsatances where they feel like outsiders. Nobody tries to kill a society they think they are a valuable member of.
The other solution is to just arm the teachers and vet them a little more carefully than the current disgrace that is US public education does. US public education is federally unionized, and laughable by any modern standards. It fails to compete because it does not have to. The most incompetent are allowed to thrive within its protected ranks. So just stop doing that.
The best solution is a combination of the two. Armed teachers, carefully vetted, with students who have some real control over how they are educated, has been remarkably effective in Israel. If you can prevent school shootings in a land beset by domestic terrorists and malcontents who want nothing more than to overthrow the state, you're probably doing a good job with state education. I'm not a fan of the state ever being in charge of education due to the natural confluence of consequences, but it works.
That said, I am entirely against banning the right of the populace to keep and bear arms. It is one of the worst solutions for "keeping the peace" as evidenced by, oh I don't know, maybe this _ https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/telford-child-sex-abuse-scandal-shropshire-sexual-exploitation-lucy-allan-a8261846.html
This is not a one-off, the most gun-controlled areas of the US have similar problems with violent crime, owing to the fact that the state will never have the same interests as an individual citizen. It fundamentally can't. The first interest of the state is staying in power, it always is, always has to be, and if it were otherwise, we'd already have protected schools.
But we don't. We have schools protected against what people see as a threat. Not what they don't see as a threat, which is the state itself. People are not meant to live under such universal education and indoctrination. They're meant to be their own selves and choose what path they think is right for them, regardless of equality.
Regulating the schools only creates the problem that was supposed to be prevented. People are not equal, and they get really, really, pissed off when they are told they should be equal to others but aren't.
Content Rules
Do not post any content on Steam containing the following:
Religious, political, and other “prone to huge arguments” threads