安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
problem is it creates the exact issue the military was trying to avoid before - high carry weight, high recoil, and losing high function auto. the round itself I think may have needed up having the same issues at intermediate rounds that the .45 did at shorter ranges. The wider, flat bullet potentially getting stopped by soft armor and wouldn't penetrate barriers in the same fashion.
Could be wrong on that but I doubt the round is used much, especially in the face of 6.8spc, 7.62X51, and 77 grain otm 5.56mm, and other available intermediate cartridges.
As far as the integral box magazine, its kind of a give and take. Stripper clips can be carried in large amounts, allowing you to carry an obscene amount of ammo on your person for less weight, but yes, in its base form that is certainly a limitation.
With full auto not being an option in civilian hands, I think the SKS shines even more so if your in a country that allows firearms.
As much as I like the SKS for being simpler and more accurate than the mass produced AK platform...
I'd take the AK in any real world situation, being able to use hi-cap magazines, and the freakish reliability of AK platform guns, with there being more abundant parts available if anything ever does break, just wins hands down.
And I am talking in original old school military format.
If we are talking about modern ones, AK wins AGAIN for all the same reasons above, but with the modern ones being a whole lot more accurate than the SKS now, and there being amazingly well done milled receivers and such available as well as a nearly endless amount of custom parts out there.
Also, using China as an example of long term SKS use is a bad idea considering they have not been in any modern engagements like the AK has and still is, The SKS in China was primarily used for "dress duty" in parades and such while the Norinco Type 54 (chinese AK47) has been their "battle rifle" since the 50s.
I love the SKS rifles, especially with the AK mag conversions (have had a few personally over the years), but as much as I hate to admit, the AK is just better in nearly every way possible.
They have AKS-74U or AK-105 for soldiers in vehicle, in fact.
watch?v=CVmCONHGPQk
Leave the thread if you don't like it. No one made you comment here. Get over your childhood issues, this thread isn't the cause.
Unlike you I have real guns. And don't backseat moderate.
Supposedly any troops from the WW2 if they had the opportunity, would ditch their weapons and grab a AK if they could, its been the best weapon of choice for all sorts of groups...the SKS isn't.
If you want to talk legendary guns, the .303 Enfield has shot more big game than any other calibre and was the mainstay of the Commonwealth armies from WW1 to WW2 and later the Korean War, my first rifle and i still love them.
China modernized the SKS a number of times while in their service. These are naturally unavailable to the public due to being full auto. This is the only footage I could find of it.
https://youtu.be/e-SXG4BAnrI
Bunch of idiots egging this poor girl on.
It doesn't change my point.
Get over your childhood issues. This thread isn't the cause you p*ssy.
Its not uncommon have a higher moa for both weapons, and while the SKS is a bit more accurate, they are still fairly similar( which makes sense when you consider they fire the exact same bullet)
3-6 MOA is nothing to brag about, for either rifle. Considering the sks is supposedly going to excel at longer distances, this becomes an even bigger issue.
Modern combat is modern combat. we aren't comparing a modern AK to a modern SKS. We're comparing vintage rifles at this rate.
Here's the thing about carrying an ungodly amount of ammo - you cant do it anyways. ounces make pounds.
Another thing you dont consider, is how many of those stripper clips do you need to carry to benefit over carry a couple AK mags? because they are more than likely going to cause a metric ♥♥♥♥ ton of noise in your ruck or on your person. Magazines are a LOT quieter than a pocket of jingling jangling stripper clips.
unless you stuff them in all the padded nooks and crannies in your pack, in which case you're going to have a hard time with a speed reload.
You dont have the same level of suppressing fire, you're reloading more, which puts you at a disadvantage in small unit tactics.