Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
For example, all the infrastructure of a port -- for receiving and servicing ships, loading and unloading cargo, allowing passengers to board and deboard, etc. -- becomes a little useless if it's underwater.
So people try to seek to maintain those conditions.
Furthermore, the Earth has been changing over time but that doesn't mean that we humans can't affect it through our actions. Should be rather obvious that we have, what with having built civilization. Might I add, that we have made these changes in what's basically a really short flash in geologic time. A few hundred or even a few thousand years isn't even chump change compared to geologic timescales of millions and even billions of years.
Science is out best avenue for expanding out knowledge, but to assume that something is 100% correct just because you hear the phrase "scientists say" goes against the everything that science is
As in, seriously. It's because you melt the ice. If you don't, it's not slippery.
Staying balanced on a bike is due to gyroscopic forces.
Yeah, I like science and all, but when the "science approved of a flat Earth" arguement can be applied to something said I tend to avoid it.
A physicist in the 60s or 70s disproved the gyroscopic effect. Basically there is not enough mass in a bicycle wheel to counteract the mass of a leaning bike and the person on it.
But the only point I was trying to make is that science typically raises more questions then it ever answers. Scientists in the early 1900s wanted to know why light from a lightbulb is always on the red end of the light spectrum. When trying to find out the answer to this question scientists just ended up breaking reality. Now here we are 100 years later with a legitimate scientific debate over reality really being real. All because a couple dudes were curious about the color from a light bulb
When it comes down to it...
The earth will outlast humans no matter what they do if they are here or not...
Well at least untill the sun expands and vaporizes earth in about 5billion or so years.
But back to the "natural state of the Earth" and more importantly the climate. You always hear this weather study shows this, and that weather study shows that. All these studies show temperatures increasing and weather patterns changing. But I've never heard anyone even ask the question "What is the sun doing?" Is the current state of the sun normal behavior? It seems necessary (at least to me) to fully understand the thing that supplies the Earths heat before we automatically place the blame for the rising temperatures on human activity