Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
However, in practice these are merely licensed for use, the ownership is for the license to play the products, not the game itself since the rights to the content still remain with EA.
The same applies to non-game software. You don't OWN Microsoft Office, for example.
Same with Steam.
EA are specifically claiming that you can get games to OWN and specify there a<re no catches to their claims.
"There isn't one - seriously! With On the House, you can score full games and expansions for free, no asterisks in sight."
"you're getting the full versions of the games or expansions"
"Once you download anything from On the House, it's yours to keep."
However, this is a restriction, since yours to keep mweans it is not YOURS. If it were, you could keep it, sell it, give it away etc.
At no point do Valve ever claim you own anyhting. In fact they particularly reference thaty trhere are NO RIGHTS OF OWNERSHIP to any licensed content.
I am not claiming there is a problem with the fact that one purchases licenses for softwarte (as is generally accepted) BUT VERY SPECIFICALLY (and uniquely to EA) They are here claiming that YOU DO ACTUALLY "OWN" the product. This is false.
Neither Micorosft nor Valve nor ny other providers ever make such claims.
We buy stuff all the time on Steam and that also implies ownership, does it not?
It's all really just legal nitpicking.
No. Again, you are conflating two entiredifferent things.
The purchase of licenses is eprfectly normal, accepted and well udnerstood (though some idiots still believe they buy games and have rights of ownership etc.) - however, it is always clear (look at SSA tc.) that the payments are for activating the license to the account etc. and there is no right of ownership.
This is nothing to do with my point.
IN THE CASE OF EA's "On The House" they (EA) SPECIFICALLY STATE that the "games are yours to keep" and that you "own" the "games".
Yes it's legal nitpicking, so what?
That means it is not a demo or a limited trial, but a game the user can play as long as he/she wants and download just as if it were a prchased game.
It does not imply ownership of the IP or game.
I see nothing on the On the House page to imply such ownership either.
https://www.origin.com/usa/en-us/store/free-games/on-the-house
And the part at the bottom even shows this:
I mean, you can do that on Steam too? Only difference is you can't play multiplayer as well without getting 200ping because, well. Steam actually uses your internet to download. But you can throttle that too.