Share your computer setup!

[AVLNCH]

Do you have a speedy new system that you’d love to show off to the world? Perhaps you’re someone who just plays casually on the home PC? Why not post your setup in here to share & compare with other members of the Steam community!

[HazmatPyro]

Publicado originalmente por Escorve:

Publicado originalmente por SHREDDER:

Why you didnt buy ryzen 9 3900x and you bought the inferior and more expensive 9900ks?

Cut the crap... The 9900KS is the superior CPU. The only thing the 3900X has over it is core count, which doesn't mean ♥♥♥♥ for most workloads.

Quit the fanboying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yahXtyrYDDU

I looked at the video and it's a gaming benchmark. It doesn't do anything to measure the performance in software like Adobe Premiere or Blender.

AMD is better for productivity and all around computer usage, Intel is the gaming CPU king.

[Autumn_]

Publicado originalmente por HazmatPyro:

Publicado originalmente por Escorve:

Cut the crap... The 9900KS is the superior CPU. The only thing the 3900X has over it is core count, which doesn't mean ♥♥♥♥ for most workloads.

Quit the fanboying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yahXtyrYDDU

I looked at the video and it's a gaming benchmark. It doesn't do anything to measure the performance in software like Adobe Premiere or Blender.

AMD is better for productivity and all around computer usage, Intel is the gaming CPU king.

Which is what he's trying to say...

[r.linder]

Publicado originalmente por HazmatPyro:

Publicado originalmente por Escorve:

Cut the crap... The 9900KS is the superior CPU. The only thing the 3900X has over it is core count, which doesn't mean ♥♥♥♥ for most workloads.

Quit the fanboying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yahXtyrYDDU

I looked at the video and it's a gaming benchmark. It doesn't do anything to measure the performance in software like Adobe Premiere or Blender.

AMD is better for productivity and all around computer usage, Intel is the gaming CPU king.

It's a gaming system... He was trying to say that the 3900X is better in general, when the 9700K is actually better at gaming...

3900X also beats the 9900K in productivity, but not by much in some cases. 9900KS is easy 5 GHz all-core, which would close the gap in a lot of work situtations, so the 9900KS is overall a much better CPU for gaming and productivity

[HazmatPyro]

Publicado originalmente por Escorve:

Publicado originalmente por HazmatPyro:

I looked at the video and it's a gaming benchmark. It doesn't do anything to measure the performance in software like Adobe Premiere or Blender.

AMD is better for productivity and all around computer usage, Intel is the gaming CPU king.

It's a gaming system... He was trying to say that the 3900X is better in general, when the 9700K is actually better at gaming...

3900X also beats the 9900K in productivity, but not by much in some cases. 9900KS is easy 5 GHz all-core, which would close the gap in a lot of work situtations, so the 9900KS is overall a much better CPU for gaming and productivity

The 64GB of ram and 3900x hints at it being used for atleast some productivity. Games will run fine with 16 gigs without any performance decrease and the 3900x rarely provide a performance increase above 64 gigs. We can't definitively know though since he didn't say what he used the pc for.

As for the 5GHz oc making it faster than the 3900x for productivity. Some benchmarks to show that's not the case and here's some benchmarks to prove it(linked to the temps section to prove that is also better there so you don't buy a furnace of a cpu)
https://youtu.be/xPhlL0dZ64M?t=281

Now, let's talk price.
The lowest I found the 9900k for was 528 dollars. 3900x was 314 dollars. As for 9900ks, it's only available on Amazon for over a grand so it's better to just overclock the CPU.

[r.linder]

Publicado originalmente por HazmatPyro:

Publicado originalmente por Escorve:

It's a gaming system... He was trying to say that the 3900X is better in general, when the 9700K is actually better at gaming...

3900X also beats the 9900K in productivity, but not by much in some cases. 9900KS is easy 5 GHz all-core, which would close the gap in a lot of work situtations, so the 9900KS is overall a much better CPU for gaming and productivity

The 64GB of ram and 3900x hints at it being used for atleast some productivity. Games will run fine with 16 gigs without any performance decrease and the 3900x rarely provide a performance increase above 64 gigs. We can't definitively know though since he didn't say what he used the pc for.

As for the 5GHz oc making it faster than the 3900x for productivity. Some benchmarks to show that's not the case and here's some benchmarks to prove it(linked to the temps section to prove that is also better there so you don't buy a furnace of a cpu)
https://youtu.be/xPhlL0dZ64M?t=281

Now, let's talk price.
The lowest I found the 9900k for was 528 dollars. 3900x was 314 dollars. As for 9900ks, it's only available on Amazon for over a grand so it's better to just overclock the CPU.

I have the 3900X, it's not much less of a furnace than the 9900KS is.

Also the dude has a 9900KS, I assume he bought 64GB because he could, not because he needed it. Hence the 9900KS.

If he was actually going for a workstation then he'd probably be using Titans and X299, not a 2080 Ti and Z390. He can clearly afford it.

[mataking1]

yes the show off topic lame

[HazmatPyro]

Publicado originalmente por Escorve:

If he was actually going for a workstation then he'd probably be using Titans and X299, not a 2080 Ti and Z390. He can clearly afford it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuqV7sSABzY

He can afford it. Also, it makes no ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ sense to use X299 when reviewing the 9900KS.

[camperboy04]

Publicado originalmente por mataking1:

yes the show off topic lame

ill fix it

[camperboy04]

Ok mines a little bit of a toaster but it works

CPU: Ryzen 3 1200 @ 3.8 ghz
GPU: XFX R9 290
MOBO: ASrock B450m pro 4
PSU: EVGA 450BT
RAM: 8 gigs Hyperx Fury 2666 @ 3000mhz
Storage: 500 gb HP EX900
WD Blue 640 gb (2008)
Case: NZXT H510i
WIFI adapter: Qualcomm Atheros AR938x

[r.linder]

Publicado originalmente por camperboy04:

Ok mines a little bit of a toaster but it works

CPU: Ryzen 3 1200 @ 3.8 ghz
GPU: XFX R9 290
MOBO: ASrock B450m pro 4
PSU: EVGA 450BT
RAM: 8 gigs Hyperx Fury 2666 @ 3000mhz
Storage: 500 gb HP EX900
WD Blue 640 gb (2008)
Case: NZXT H510i
WIFI adapter: Qualcomm Atheros AR938x

Not really a toaster... it's better than what most people have.

[camperboy04]

Publicado originalmente por Escorve:

Publicado originalmente por camperboy04:

Ok mines a little bit of a toaster but it works

CPU: Ryzen 3 1200 @ 3.8 ghz
GPU: XFX R9 290
MOBO: ASrock B450m pro 4
PSU: EVGA 450BT
RAM: 8 gigs Hyperx Fury 2666 @ 3000mhz
Storage: 500 gb HP EX900
WD Blue 640 gb (2008)
Case: NZXT H510i
WIFI adapter: Qualcomm Atheros AR938x

Not really a toaster... it's better than what most people have.

im guessing you arent most people

[r.linder]

Publicado originalmente por camperboy04:

Publicado originalmente por Escorve:

Not really a toaster... it's better than what most people have.

im guessing you arent most people

Nope. But I was. I used to have an A10-7860K and R9 270X (and then RX 580) before Ryzen.

System Specifications
CPU/Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (12-core/24-thread)
CPU Cooling: Deepcool Castle 360 RGB V2 (Noctua NT-H1)
Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (F50, ASUS antenna)
RAM/Memory: Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB - 32GB (4X8) DDR4-3200 CL16 (3600 CL16 OC)
GPU/Video Card: Gigabyte AORUS Radeon RX 5700 XT
SSD #1 (Boot Drive): ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro - 512GB
SSD #2: ADATA XPG SX8200 - 960GB
HDD #1: Western Digital 5400RPM - 4TB
PSU/Power Supply: SeaSonic FOCUS Plus Gold 850W (CableMod ext.)
Chassis/Case: Lian Li O11 Dynamic (2 Deepcool 200EX RGB LED strips)
Case Fans: Corsair SP120 RGB (6)

Displays:
Display #1: ASUS ROG STRIX XG27VQ (1080P 144HZ, VA)

Peripherals:
Keyboard: Corsair K70 RGB MK.2
Mouse: Corsair NIGHTSWORD RGB/Corsair SCIMITAR PRO RGB
Headset: Sennheiser GAME ZERO Black
Microphone: Sennheiser built-in mic, Blue Microphones Yeti Blackout Edition
AMP/DAC: FiiO E10K
Speakers: Logitech Z623 Speakers w/ Subwoofer
Mousepad: HyperX Fury S Pro XL

Other Equipment:
Chair: Staples Vartan Gaming Chair (Red)
Desk: Custom Built

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2023987726

[SHREDDER]

Publicado originalmente por HazmatPyro:

Publicado originalmente por Escorve:

If he was actually going for a workstation then he'd probably be using Titans and X299, not a 2080 Ti and Z390. He can clearly afford it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuqV7sSABzY

He can afford it. Also, it makes no ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ sense to use X299 when reviewing the 9900KS.

Just because you can afford dosent mean that you must buy the best pc avaliable. I also can afford 3900x 2080ti and 64 gb ram but i dont do it because there is no need for it on games at max settings 1440p that iam playing at least not for now. Only if you have a 4k monitor you will realy need such a pc. For 1440p and 1080p monitors not such pc is needed.

[HazmatPyro]

Publicado originalmente por SHREDDER:

Publicado originalmente por HazmatPyro:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuqV7sSABzY

He can afford it. Also, it makes no ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ sense to use X299 when reviewing the 9900KS.

Just because you can afford dosent mean that you must buy the best pc avaliable. I also can afford 3900x 2080ti and 64 gb ram but i dont do it because there is no need for it on games at max settings 1440p that iam playing at least not for now. Only if you have a 4k monitor you will realy need such a pc. For 1440p and 1080p monitors not such pc is needed.

I never said that. I said that claiming Paul's hardware can't afford an X299 PC is stupid.

[SpookyCitrus]

Publicado originalmente por SHREDDER:

Publicado originalmente por HazmatPyro:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuqV7sSABzY

He can afford it. Also, it makes no ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ sense to use X299 when reviewing the 9900KS.

Just because you can afford dosent mean that you must buy the best pc avaliable. I also can afford 3900x 2080ti and 64 gb ram but i dont do it because there is no need for it on games at max settings 1440p that iam playing at least not for now. Only if you have a 4k monitor you will realy need such a pc. For 1440p and 1080p monitors not such pc is needed.

Jesus, can you not just stay gone. You just keep coming back to argue with people. No one cares what you can afford to buy, next time you post it should be when you upgrade your current PC or build a new PC, not posting your same computer specs over and over, speculating about future hardware, or arguing with people. You want to tell people what you plan on buying/not buying or want to theorize about new hardware? Make a new discussion and argue with people who disagree with you on there.