Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
They do have room to release a bigger die GPU peg it at 550W, might be a 5080 killer, hard to know when just speculating, you could do the maths to get a rough idea but power draw vs performance isn't linear so still tricky to be accurate.
Margins are something you chase when you have nothing to lose by chasing them; you never invest to chase margins.
Of course there is, market leader mind share is what sells lower end GPU's too, it's why Nvidia rocks a 90% market share at the moment.
They could, but what's the point of making a single 9090XT when for the same silicon a couple of Ryzen 9 9950X3Ds can bring more profit?
Well no because AMD used a half baked cheap version of the DP 2.1 spec and its only 54GB not 80GB no ask yourself would you want that lot making such a card?
I mean lets say you play older games... You know the ones that can keep a steady 120 framerate and you buy a shiny new 2025 4k 240hz OLED and oops you cant run that on AMD lol too bad AMD know better than you about your own usage statistics what a bonkers company...
Not necessarily.
The 9070 XT does about as expected at a TDP range of 275-320W
7900 XTX is rated for 350-420W
If AMD was serious and did it right they could probably do a 4090 level GPU and stay around 500W. Even a 4090 you can under volt it and push it to use less max power while still maintaining peak performance in most things