Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
They do have room to release a bigger die GPU peg it at 550W, might be a 5080 killer, hard to know when just speculating, you could do the maths to get a rough idea but power draw vs performance isn't linear so still tricky to be accurate.
Margins are something you chase when you have nothing to lose by chasing them; you never invest to chase margins.
Of course there is, market leader mind share is what sells lower end GPU's too, it's why Nvidia rocks a 90% market share at the moment.
They could, but what's the point of making a single 9090XT when for the same silicon a couple of Ryzen 9 9950X3Ds can bring more profit?
Well no because AMD used a half baked cheap version of the DP 2.1 spec and its only 54GB not 80GB no ask yourself would you want that lot making such a card?
I mean lets say you play older games... You know the ones that can keep a steady 120 framerate and you buy a shiny new 2025 4k 240hz OLED and oops you cant run that on AMD lol too bad AMD know better than you about your own usage statistics what a bonkers company...
Not necessarily.
The 9070 XT does about as expected at a TDP range of 275-320W
7900 XTX is rated for 350-420W
If AMD was serious and did it right they could probably do a 4090 level GPU and stay around 500W. Even a 4090 you can under volt it and push it to use less max power while still maintaining peak performance in most things