Asus or msi qd oled?

[DruggedBunny]

Debating wether asus pg32ucdm or msi 321urx!
Both are on sale for same price and would love some intel! All info i find is people talking about future firmwares fixing this or that but idk how they compare now!
Sale enda in 2h and would love some help asap <3

[DruggedBunny]

Anyone?

[RPG Gamer Man]

Firmware to fix what? You need to explain more info about them.

[Ð₳Ɽ₭★𐌔Ŧ₳Ɽ]

I would pick the ASUS ROG Swift 32” 4K OLED

[VIC1OUSTHREAT]

asus is better than msi for monitors look reviews from tftcentral or monitorsunboxed. good reliable websites.

[_I_]

32 is too small for 4k, for a monitor at arms length go no smaller than 40 for 4k, or 27 for 1440p or 20 for 1080p

[Pocahawtness]

I've never bought MSI, but I have had several Asus monitors. They have always been very good, just watch out for the Asus-tax.

[ˢᵈˣ FatCat]

koorui

[Arbiter of mediocrity]

Neither. Buy directly from the panel supplier Samsung and LG. I also wouldn't buy these monitors since they are overpriced for what they offer. Instead I'd opt for a qd oled TV. Higher brightness, better bt2020 coverage and 144hz is more than enough for competitive titles. Keep in mind that oled is blazing fast compared to LCD. You don't need 240hz+ to compensate for poor pixel response time of the LCD

[_I_]

there are only a few oled panel makers
if they are the exact same size, odds are its the same panel
just different main, power boards and bezel

look up monitor reviews to see which is actually better

[Rod]

Originally posted by _I_:

32 is too small for 4k, for a monitor at arms length go no smaller than 40 for 4k, or 27 for 1440p or 20 for 1080p

I play nintendo switch at 160ish ppi and theres still aliasing thats a 15 inch 1080p OLED and thats at arms length i would want 160ppi all the time thats why my next buy is 4k 27 inch.


32 inch is a complete scam lol its not even a monitor, Its a flipping TV with displayport.

[DruggedBunny]

Originally posted by Yhorm:

Neither. Buy directly from the panel supplier Samsung and LG. I also wouldn't buy these monitors since they are overpriced for what they offer. Instead I'd opt for a qd oled TV. Higher brightness, better bt2020 coverage and 144hz is more than enough for competitive titles. Keep in mind that oled is blazing fast compared to LCD. You don't need 240hz+ to compensate for poor pixel response time of the LCD

Kinda said theyre on sale, hence why in considering

[DruggedBunny]

Originally posted by Rod:

Originally posted by _I_:

32 is too small for 4k, for a monitor at arms length go no smaller than 40 for 4k, or 27 for 1440p or 20 for 1080p

I play nintendo switch at 160ish ppi and theres still aliasing thats a 15 inch 1080p OLED and thats at arms length i would want 160ppi all the time thats why my next buy is 4k 27 inch.


32 inch is a complete scam lol its not even a monitor, Its a flipping TV with displayport.

Isnt the ppi on 4k 32’’ sharp enough?

[Arbiter of mediocrity]

Originally posted by DruggedBunny:

Originally posted by Yhorm:

Neither. Buy directly from the panel supplier Samsung and LG. I also wouldn't buy these monitors since they are overpriced for what they offer. Instead I'd opt for a qd oled TV. Higher brightness, better bt2020 coverage and 144hz is more than enough for competitive titles. Keep in mind that oled is blazing fast compared to LCD. You don't need 240hz+ to compensate for poor pixel response time of the LCD

Kinda said theyre on sale, hence why in considering

By how much? if it's just 100 quid then I suggest you opt for the TV instead. An s90d is much better but you decide for yourself. I personally can't stand mat displays

Originally posted by DruggedBunny:

Originally posted by Rod:

I play nintendo switch at 160ish ppi and theres still aliasing thats a 15 inch 1080p OLED and thats at arms length i would want 160ppi all the time thats why my next buy is 4k 27 inch.


32 inch is a complete scam lol its not even a monitor, Its a flipping TV with displayport.

Isnt the ppi on 4k 32’’ sharp enough?

Nope. You need at least 200ppi for crisp image quality. That's why your average smart phone amoled looks so much better than your larger screens

[DruggedBunny]

Originally posted by Yhorm:

Originally posted by DruggedBunny:

Kinda said theyre on sale, hence why in considering

By how much? if it's just 100 quid then I suggest you opt for the TV instead. An s90d is much better but you decide for yourself. I personally can't stand mat displays

Originally posted by DruggedBunny:

Isnt the ppi on 4k 32’’ sharp enough?

Nope. You need at least 200ppi for crisp image quality. That's why your average smart phone amoled looks so much better than your larger screens

Obv i dont want no tv, i already got 2 oked tvs if i wanna game on a tv with my laptop.
And if you NEED 200ppi youre on crack dude

[Arbiter of mediocrity]

Originally posted by DruggedBunny:

Originally posted by Yhorm:

By how much? if it's just 100 quid then I suggest you opt for the TV instead. An s90d is much better but you decide for yourself. I personally can't stand mat displays


Nope. You need at least 200ppi for crisp image quality. That's why your average smart phone amoled looks so much better than your larger screens

Obv i dont want no tv, i already got 2 oked tvs if i wanna game on a tv with my laptop.
And if you NEED 200ppi youre on crack dude

I wish phone manufacturers could hear your wisdom - which they can't because they are clearly on cocaine refuse - considering they would have wasted less investing so much in R&D to manufacture displays with 400ppi+. Obvious sarcasm and btw if you can't tell the difference, definitely make an appointment with your oculist

Furthermore if you don't want a TV then that's good for you. It doesn't magically offset the poor quality and price to performance ratio of the monitors but you clearly are a few chromosomes short of a prefrontal cortex to grasp that

Good luck in your life and hopefully your environment is indulgent towards your interesting character. Interesting meant facetiously