Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
Reguli și ghiduri pentru discuții
Raportează această postare
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQdZ7E2_jc0
Maybe running a 5.1 system in stereo makes sense if you have a mind to upgrade to a surround sound setup down the line, but otherwise I wouldn't recommend that.
Spending $250 on a 5.1 system is a bit wasteful because each separate channel is going to have its own amplification circuit. In some rare cases you might be able to bridge the circuits together, but if not then you're spending money on amplification you're not even using and likely keeping those amplifiers powered on besides. That isn't even to mention the tax Dolby and maybe D.T.S. extract from it as well for the inclusion of their surround processing stuff. Speaking of which, there's going to be some marginal post-processing applied to the signal. The home theater amplifiers are usually just a bunch of class Ds strung together anyway.
If you're going to spend that kind of money on a stereo setup and dedicate that much desk space to a stereo setup and be really, really picky about the quality of the amplifier, then it'd be better to get something along the lines of an Emotiva BasX A2m Stereo Flex Amplifier[emotiva.com], an maybe an Onkyo TX 8220[www.amazon.com] or maybe the Sony Sony STRDH190[www.amazon.com], in that order of brand preference (sony makes some good stuff, but they're more hit 'n miss). More of the budget can go into making a quality stereo product.
Plus spending the money for the purest audiophile grade speaker amps. doesn't make much sense if you're just going to pair them with the cheapest speakers possible. Kinda strikes me like buying a blu-ray player to play back video on a 480p screen.
Moreover, Drugged Bunny mentioned space constraints already, so all of those are off of the table and a desktop, so realistically, the best amp. we're actually looking at is going to be more along the lines of a Topping PA3s[www.amazon.com] ($150).or a Schiit Rekkr[www.amazon.com], Fossi Audio BT20A Pro[www.amazon.com] or the Dayton Audio DTA 100st[www.parts-express.com]. I'm not really sure which of those is the best though. Its been a while since I've been in the market for speaker amps. and don't really parse the specs. too well. Might go with the Dayton since it has an optional high pass filter, allowing you to pair it with a sub. at a later date for some killer bass.
If we're spending around $150 money on the Amp then that only leaves us with $200 or less for the speakers. I'd probably say get the Klipsh R-51M[www.amazon.com] 'cause they have a 5.25" woofer (plenty of other speakers in this price range only have 4" woofers) and that specialized wave guide.
I mean, I'd rather go a little more speaker heavy on the budget, hence my initial recommenation, but if we're going to look at investing more on the amp, there are simply better ways to go about it than a surround sound receiver, unless you're looking at a surround sound receiver from a thrift shop.
But definitely don't try to make a 5.1 system do a stereo receiver's job, or if you do, at least go to the local thrift store and pick it up for more like $50 than $250. Those things get donated all of the time in my locality.
Finally, with passive speakers, you can just upgrade the amplifier at a later date because they are discrete components, so you don't particularly have to worry if the first one you buy isn't good enough though, and you don't really need to run them full blast anyway. At lower volumes the S.N.R. should be lower too.
Logitech does the job for the money but there is no comparison in sound quality between $250-$350 speakers. I had few Logitech models including one of THX models and they are mostly about loud bass and nothing else.
https://www.newegg.com/creative-t40-ii-wired-2-0/p/36-116-044?Item=36-116-044&cm_sp=product-_-from-price-options
a half decent 2.1 set of 70-ish euro. (a bit better than those 10 euro crappy pc speakers) will do fine for me too.. for pc use.
but the best advise is get some old speakers might be even stereo speakers from a 80s stereoset... (you can get surprising good deals on quite expensive models... as well with just cassette and radio (and sometimes cd) they aint really what people use anymore..
with that : buy the neccecairty gear to translates your pc's digital out to their signal.
will be a vastly better sound experience than even the most expensive pc speakers sold at a fraction of the price.
Also have Bluetooth so i can use them with my phone.
This particular model even has subwoofer support and some sellers sell such sets.
https://amzn.eu/d/hGw6pqx
theyre so good bestbuy has been selling the same ones model year after model year for 8 years, with 5 star reviews because...
they pound. if youre looking for bass match these with a bass boosting program and youre whole block will think youre having a party.