Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
De auteur van dit onderwerp heeft een bericht gemarkeerd als antwoord op zijn of haar vraag.
Regels en richtlijnen voor discussies
Dit bericht rapporteren
Fully agree, it's even better after a couple debloating tweaks.
There is only 1 proper gaming OS on PC and that's windows.
The differences in performance between 10 & 11 are for the majority negligible.
If we're talking about linux distro's probably the most idiot proof setup is something like bazzite, which improves on steamOS with even more current kernel and drivers while keeping the immutable os configuration.
https://bazzite.gg/
but lets play the game, W7
Relax, I didn't mean for it to be taken seriously, and I agree with you for the most part. I just posted this because I was curious to see different perspectives on it. The main things to take into account are just overall resource economy and compatible stability. Windows trumps stability obviously, but has disappointing resource use on idle, while Linux trumps resource economy but has stability issues, maybe there's a middle ground I don't know of.
Smoothbrain level question indeed, but without it I wouldn't have known Bazzite was a thing, so thanks for that, brother.
They only did one thing: boot up the game immediately.
>...>; but things slowed down as generation numbers increased.
Right now you first boot up into the console's OS before the game is launched; sometimes you even need to select the game, before it is launched.
The best gaming OS just runs the game, and does nothing else in the mean time. It optimizes towards launching the game and pouring all resources to the game. Currently, only really old consoles do this. Homebrew stuff with choice menus also sort of do this, at least they're minimalistic.
Considering windows; what would make it the best for gaming.
Windows booting up fast, windows launching the game fast, doing little to nothing other than running the game.
Currently windows 8.1 fits that bill the most; even though it lacks of directx12
which... pretty much shows what direction micorsoft went and how they feel about you 'knowing and' deciding what runs.
I think Linux has the most potential to become the best Gaming OS; simply because it will at that stage just run what you ask it to; the game.
Wut? You think Windows is more stable than Linux? What nonsense site did you get your information from? The primary benefit of Windows over Linux is software (games) compatibility; not because it is more stable than Linux.
Your original question ignores what types of games are being discussed. For a very broad generalized answer with game compatibility in mind; Windows 11 24H2. If all your games are supported via proton and don't have anti-cheat that developers refuse to implement on Linux then there are several Linux options available that would work better than Windows.
By stability I just mean overall compatibility with games, and therefore how stable it can run without issues, I say that having used Linux before, and gaming on it a lot, and generally speaking your average game requires a lot of finesse and tweaking to run smoothly without any issues - even with native support or a solid Proton/Wine layer it yielded a handful of issues on some games; issues that Windows doesn't have out of the box, and yes - I did just mean broad gaming as a whole.
I get this is a very general question, but really I mean this more as a topic for discussion - I wasn't looking for a dead-narrow answer. Just a broad spectrum of opinions and their reasoning behind it.
Ahhhh of course, point taken, I see what you mean.
Damn that's interesting, first time hearing about the LTSC versions, and it does look really promising. Like you said it's safe to assume most games will be Windows 11 exclusive - it being the bloated mess of capitalism that it is, but knowing the LTSC version cuts out on a lot of that is really good to know, because really the only thing keeping me from switching fully to Linux is knowing some games and apps are Windows exclusive and I need to keep it as an option. Will definitely look to replace with LTSC soon. Thanks a lot.
Linux is more stable, more secure, wastes fewer resources, and performs better than modern Windows, and Valve is investing a lot of their time into bolstering it because they want to ensure that PC gaming has a future since they know that Windows isn't going to survive forever while it's going in the direction that Microsoft is taking it, which is leaning more to the commercial and business side of things.
The issue is that LTSC is only available for the business market so getting it isn't as simple as getting regular versions like Home or Pro versions, you have to talk to a licensed seller of said LTSC versions
SteamOS is only available on the Deck, Bazzite is made to be similar to SteamOS and works on most machines.
One wonders why they want to remove the Control Panel and not the Add/Remove Windows Features menu, since it does nothing. You will be sodomized with each new antifeature and you will thank them on bended knee.
Changing ownership permissions and deleting system folders, and setting Group Policies lets Windows 10 be somewhat usable, but it's not worth the effort anymore.