Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i9-10900K-vs-Intel-Core-i7-7700K/4071vs3647
The biggest upgrades is more cores and threads but unless you do things that actually utilise the extra cores and threads going for that CPU would be wasted. Not saying it's not worth the money. Just that if you won't take advantage of the higher core/threads money would be better spent of a different CPU
the sockets have the same number of pins, but different layout and chipsets making it not compatible with your current board
oops
more cores/threads, will be a good improvement for games that need it
core performance is slightly better, but not by enough to justify the upgrade by itself
Thank you.
Thanks.
To give you an idea though -
https://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/3423-intel-i7-7700k-revisit-benchmark-vs-9700k-2700-9900k
well worth it in my opinion.4cores doesnt cut it anymore (and yes that goes for gaming
as well)
Completely different layout and pin count.