Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
I do wonder why you feel it would need to be replaced on a laptop that is less than a year old.
even if they are, thermal paste has a superior thermal conductivity according to google... like 8.3W/mK v.s. 70W/mK
Yes, that shows liquid metal is superior at thermal conductivity.
Liquid metal is a more modern thermal solution, though more dangerous is not contained properly with superior results than standard thermal paste.
the revolution was non-conductive thermal compounds.
Not to be used without proper knowledge of application, cleanup and containment. Why the PS5 uses a barrier around the die to keep it contained and minimize damage from leaking.
also thermal paste is over-hyped and largely not that big of a deal... the whole top of the chip is a heat spreader.
IMO you should not be so concerned with the paste on there and just leave it... but you're ofc free to pay for w.e you want.
Though, would never advise to not use thermal paste. A good thermal paste can well exceed a difference of 15C or more in difference vs none, especially on newer CPU's that are quite hot. If you're rocking an Intel or AMD from 2010, the difference won't be as large since such low thermal emission compared to modern die.
I'm pretty confident this is some marketing hype you're buying into... "liquid metal" thermal compound is not a revolution in cooling.
You can research it later on at your own leisure to learn more and educate yourself on what liquid metal is, or not since seems going heavily off topic. Just seems you want to argue really.
it's just one of those things I don't think matters, but as I said if you want to pay for it have at er.
this^^ guy truly is new....NOTHING beats liquid metal on heat transfer....NOTHING......nothing from the 90's will even touch what thermal paste made today can do.....
before you waste more people's time with delusional responses understand, liquid metal is 10 times the thermal conduction then thermal paste....and that is the worst liquid metal VS the best thermal paste on the market.....
To be honest that's just the nature of laptops I don't think a re-paste is going to change that. I will say that I under volted my cpu (-30 offset which is the max Asus allows in their bios) and gaming I'm usually in the 70s on cpu and gpu.
Who is talking about trades? I don't think manufacturers have an issue with liquid metal since they are the ones using it. They also usually have some form of gasket to keep the liquid metal from getting into places it shouldn't. Liquid metal failures are almost always some person who thought they knew what they were doing and end up making a mess.