安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
So for me the question is this, is either solution going to do a bad job at spinning fans? If ever the settings you choose are slightly less than optimal, what impact is that going to have on your system? Is it zero? Then it doesn't matter which.
That being said do you want to micromanage fans? Then plug them into the hub. If you're happy with the system controlling the fans (I am) then plug them into the motherboard. In times past when I've had case controlled fans I might have adjusted them once or twice over the life of the machine. Controlling fans might sound interesting or worthwhile, but once the novelty is over in most cases it's just fluff to get in the way.
bios knows the temps of cpu/gpu/vrm/chipset that need cooling
on system lockup or other severe errors that can crash the os, whatever software is controlling the fans will not tell them to change speeds when temps go too high after the crash
on newer boards, in bios fan control pages, you can set profiles for each fan header
based on cpu/gpu/system temps, no matter what happens in the os
when the pc is on it ill control the speeds, even during crash or hard lockups