安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
So for me the question is this, is either solution going to do a bad job at spinning fans? If ever the settings you choose are slightly less than optimal, what impact is that going to have on your system? Is it zero? Then it doesn't matter which.
That being said do you want to micromanage fans? Then plug them into the hub. If you're happy with the system controlling the fans (I am) then plug them into the motherboard. In times past when I've had case controlled fans I might have adjusted them once or twice over the life of the machine. Controlling fans might sound interesting or worthwhile, but once the novelty is over in most cases it's just fluff to get in the way.
bios knows the temps of cpu/gpu/vrm/chipset that need cooling
on system lockup or other severe errors that can crash the os, whatever software is controlling the fans will not tell them to change speeds when temps go too high after the crash
on newer boards, in bios fan control pages, you can set profiles for each fan header
based on cpu/gpu/system temps, no matter what happens in the os
when the pc is on it ill control the speeds, even during crash or hard lockups