安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Try updating it if you havent and see what happens.
If your subscription ended that could also be a possible cause for auto protect not enabling.
If it comes to it, just uninstall it and reinstall it.
No, not really.
Norton Security 2016 actually rates quite highly - as they have moved from just virus defintions into more application control, etc. Which is lighter on resources, faster performance, and better detection.
Protection against 0-day malware attacks, inclusive of web and e-mail threats (Real-World Testing) - 164 samples used scored 100% (last March/April)
False detection 1 out of 1,217,779 samples used.
You can compare them here:
https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/home-windows/
Just sort by performance / protection. I personally like 'Kaspersky Lab Internet Security 2016', 'MalwareBytes' and/or 'SpyBot'. Norton and Mcafee use to be terrible/slow, but Norton is catching up. I highly recommend application control + firewall, over basic virus definition detections these days.
---
Attempt to reinstall it.
If you are using other security software or other apps which might conflict, ensure they aren't on real-time monitoring, rather just manual run or remove. Multiple scanner can cause slow downs or conflict issues with each others - some now even disable/block each other to prevent this.
Exactly
Norton isnt the crap it used to be, its gotten much better over the years starting with the 2012 or 2013 editions.
and Malwarebytes Anti-Malware paid
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.ru/2016/06/how-to-compromise-enterprise-endpoint.html
Have nice day!