(Norton Anti-Virus) Auto-Protect isn't fixing itself.
I just got online for the first time in a month due to cable issues, and Norton tells me I need to turn on Auto-Protect. I click the "Fix Now" button under the security tab, and a couple seconds later it tells me that it isn't fixed. A couple more attempts, and it keeps saying the same thing.

What should I do?

>inb4 everyone says to get a different Anti-Virus
< >
Wyświetlanie 1-9 z 9 komentarzy
[☥] - CJ - 28 czerwca 2016 o 14:24 
Are there any updates for it? Definitions etc so on? After a month there should be.
Try updating it if you havent and see what happens.

If your subscription ended that could also be a possible cause for auto protect not enabling.

If it comes to it, just uninstall it and reinstall it.
Azza ☠ 28 czerwca 2016 o 14:32 
Are you using other real-time anti-virus scanners, such as Malwarebytes, etc... on the side?
Maddie Gaming 28 czerwca 2016 o 14:56 
Początkowo opublikowane przez ☥ - CJ -:
Are there any updates for it? Definitions etc so on? After a month there should be.
Try updating it if you havent and see what happens.

If your subscription ended that could also be a possible cause for auto protect not enabling.

If it comes to it, just uninstall it and reinstall it.
I got and installed an update before I started having this problem.


Początkowo opublikowane przez Azza ☠:
Are you using other real-time anti-virus scanners, such as Malwarebytes, etc... on the side?
No, not really.
Azza ☠ 28 czerwca 2016 o 17:20 
Depending on your version of Norton... it's not that bad. It's improved greatly compared to it's past of being a slow memory hog.

Norton Security 2016 actually rates quite highly - as they have moved from just virus defintions into more application control, etc. Which is lighter on resources, faster performance, and better detection.

Protection against 0-day malware attacks, inclusive of web and e-mail threats (Real-World Testing) - 164 samples used scored 100% (last March/April)

False detection 1 out of 1,217,779 samples used.

You can compare them here:
https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/home-windows/

Just sort by performance / protection. I personally like 'Kaspersky Lab Internet Security 2016', 'MalwareBytes' and/or 'SpyBot'. Norton and Mcafee use to be terrible/slow, but Norton is catching up. I highly recommend application control + firewall, over basic virus definition detections these days.

---

Attempt to reinstall it.

If you are using other security software or other apps which might conflict, ensure they aren't on real-time monitoring, rather just manual run or remove. Multiple scanner can cause slow downs or conflict issues with each others - some now even disable/block each other to prevent this.
Ostatnio edytowany przez: Azza ☠; 28 czerwca 2016 o 17:43
[☥] - CJ - 28 czerwca 2016 o 19:07 
Początkowo opublikowane przez Azza ☠:
Depending on your version of Norton... it's not that bad. It's improved greatly compared to it's past of being a slow memory hog.

Norton Security 2016 actually rates quite highly - as they have moved from just virus defintions into more application control, etc. Which is lighter on resources, faster performance, and better detection.

Protection against 0-day malware attacks, inclusive of web and e-mail threats (Real-World Testing) - 164 samples used scored 100% (last March/April)

False detection 1 out of 1,217,779 samples used.

You can compare them here:
https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/home-windows/

Just sort by performance / protection. I personally like 'Kaspersky Lab Internet Security 2016', 'MalwareBytes' and/or 'SpyBot'. Norton and Mcafee use to be terrible/slow, but Norton is catching up. I highly recommend application control + firewall, over basic virus definition detections these days.

---

Attempt to reinstall it.

If you are using other security software or other apps which might conflict, ensure they aren't on real-time monitoring, rather just manual run or remove. Multiple scanner can cause slow downs or conflict issues with each others - some now even disable/block each other to prevent this.

Exactly
Norton isnt the crap it used to be, its gotten much better over the years starting with the 2012 or 2013 editions.
Bad 💀 Motha 29 czerwca 2016 o 14:38 
If you want a good paid one; look as Kaspersky or ESET NOD32

and Malwarebytes Anti-Malware paid
banzaigtv 29 czerwca 2016 o 16:53 
Kaspersky and Bitdefender are great AV programs. Norton sucks.
Seven7 30 czerwca 2016 o 3:52 
Seven 7 !!! years old vulnerabilities in Norton
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.ru/2016/06/how-to-compromise-enterprise-endpoint.html
Have nice day!
hawkeye 30 czerwca 2016 o 4:22 
Malwarebytes always picked up stuff that Norton missed on my pc.
< >
Wyświetlanie 1-9 z 9 komentarzy
Na stronę: 1530 50

Data napisania: 28 czerwca 2016 o 13:35
Posty: 9