安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Because you are running Nvidia.
Install Intel CPU micro code:
Also install the Nvidia drivers if you haven't already:
Arch just broke QQ, when i start it via GRUB i get a black screen with this "typing line" and nothing else, no words, no letters nothing.
If one don't can't figure that out oneself I doubt Arch is the best choice. Personally I would likely had gone with OpenSUSE but for Steam and compatibility maybe it's best going Ubuntu.
As for grub I'm not up for the task without googling.
2. Post glxinfo output
This means by default that Arch actually has better hardware support then Ubuntu does, Arch running a newer kernel automatically means it has better support for devices.
If you desire to run proprietary drivers for your devices Arch has you covered there as well with the AUR, the Arch User Repository contains basically every driver, tool and piece of software available for GNU/LInux packaged for Arch.
Installing modules? what?
https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/966480657397214262/B20B7ADC2BACCB0AF4503D73D470DC753C74076A/
Linux disro's like ARCH require you to configure and mount those drviers manually once while using command line interface. UBUNTU and others have a wider support installation system. More notably we have he above screenshot. If the OP is asking the questiona nd complaining about ARCH Linux being too slow, they probably should either learn to make and install their own hardware modules, or use a distro that has wide commercial support to have them made. UBUNTU will better support new people tyo Linux than ARCH will.
Ubuntu has more support for current hardware updates. If the OP is having issues configuring Arch Linux, it is because it is not supported as easily for newbies to Linux without modifying the source code for the drivers meant to run on other distro's.
But I totally agree with you: Arch linux doesn't look as wise choice.
If you download the Nvidia drivers for Linux 64-bit from the Nvidia website you will see that you get a .run file, this file is NOT distribution specific and can be used on any distro. The maintainers of the Nvidia driver for your distribution should make sure that it's up-to-date and working correctly on your distribution.
And downloading drivers from the web is the most un-Linux way of aquiring software.
Hardware modules don't exist, I think you are refering to kernel modules. The majority of devices do not require proprietary drivers since a basic driver will already be implemented in the Linux kernel. Only when you need extra features or better optimization do you need proprietary drivers. Generally the only proprietary drivers you install on a Linux gaming machine is the CPU microcode and if you run a Nvidia GPU the GPU drivers.
Even Arch users generally don't have to touch kernel modules. Everything is already available from the software repos.
A little backstory to G1K777, we had a chat, he is secretly a Linux fanboy stuck on Windows, I told him to use Arch because Ubuntu is for noobs. :P
He installed Arch as a challenge.
https://i.imgur.com/qx4jjTK.jpg
ArchLinux is just arbitrarily complex to configure from scratch which has no real "benefit" at all. Arch from a system-admin perspective is a total nightmare with regards to management.
There is 0 wrong with Ubuntu, apart from requiring minimal configuration. If you want a functional system from day one.
Ubuntu
or
Fedora.
And can you become a master of linux without ever touching ArchLinux? Yes you can.
ArchLinux is adminstratively costly, not only in configuration but also maintainence required.
I agree, I also use Ubuntu because it's quick to install and just works. I have to spend nearly 2 hours in Arch to achieve what I can do in Ubuntu or Fedora in 15 minutes.
But from the perspective of the poweruser who is running the latest hardware and wants to run the latest software it's great.
And playing sys-admin on your Arch machine is just fun. And there is a lot you can learn from running a distro like Arch.
These are the main reasons why Arch and Arch-based distros such as Manjaro and Antergos are so popular.