安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
2) The Windows 10 fix for meltdown has been tested and barely affects performance
Epic Games has shared a graph showcasing the significant performance impact of the Intel security fix on one of its gaming servers. So this is not just hype and BS.
https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/speculative-execution
My PC is not an Epic Games server.
And yes, servers are affected more significantly. Your average Joe is not.
Then what about the AMD processors effected by Spectre? If you want to make a list, make it a full list.
https://www.windowscentral.com/all-modern-processors-impacted-new-meltdown-and-spectre-exploits
I was trying to reply to the other comment you made, but the adjustment bureau thingy happened. Yeah lets hope Intel do find a solution for online gaming server issues for us gamers. I have a Intel labtop and thinking about a new desktop build for this year to replace the old one.
If you can both mind read I can and will take both comments seriously.
Today : Intel exploits.
I missed out on the WannaCry Ransomware news. So thanks for that late news update.
I'm pretty sure it's just to remind me of how much I hate Intel's naming convention for Core processors, where "2nd generation Intel® Core™ processors" were/are the fourth (or more) generation of CPUs to use the Core name.