Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Regras e diretrizes para discussões
Denunciar esta mensagem
Is hyper threading disabled in bios? If so turn it on. If it can be turned off that is.
Also run afterburner or HW monitor or something such while loading your system with either benchmark or game and see if the CPU get hot or not. Maybe also show clock speed / see it in system monitor. If the cpu throttles / run slower maybe the CPU cooler is weak? Stock one? Stock one with poor case fans? It could maybe also be if the VRM on the motherboard isn't too good and you lack airflow and it get hot and throttles because of that.
Also check if anything hogging the cpu in the background. Windows Update doing something ?What is your idle cpu usage ?
imho.
My CPU usage is around 90/95 while gaming, and the CPU temperture sits around 70 while gaming.
As for the clock speed, i can't see it in the afterburner, but will test it out later still.
Have also yet to check the BIOS for hyperthreading
Win10 has obvious performance advantages over Win8
As you can still upgrade to Win10 for free by using your Win8 key to activate it, that would be my suggestion.
You can set the OSD to display the CPUs clocks in game
-
Another thing to do would be to dust out the PC, especially if you havent done it lately, the PCs age may benefit from a good dusting out, GPU included.
Ifs unfortunate you didnt go with the K-CPU since you have a Z board, you could have benefitted from that but owell.
-
Using the userbenchmark crap isnt a good thing to use, it can give you a GENERAL idea, but many different factors will set yours apart from others with the same hardware.
https://www.passmark.com/
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/
https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/
Treat any of those utilities available from "we'll fix your pc for you" websites with suspicion as they can do more harm than good.
Make sure your pc bios is set to high performance.
This score is only about the processor right?
Single core score, relative a different processor model or your processor model? I don't know. since average is 75% I assume it's another one.
Single-core, integer (~all instructions except those for floating point (decimal numbers) I guess), 99.7
Single-core, floating point: 101
Single-core, varying instructions: 98.9
There you have a 99.7 score, if that's relative your CPU model and the average is 100 then you're close to it, if it's relative everyone or some other CPU then you are close to that.
Quad-core, integer: 243
Quad-core, float: 261
Quad-core, mixed: 257
I don't know if these are relative numbers, since it's supposed to measure 4x performance and the score is ~2.5x higher it would kinde seem like it measure according to the same scale as the single-core test. End result 254, 58%, 58% of what? All systems? If so your score is lower because there's more tested systems with more cores and more threads now, of a different CPU? If so we need to know what that CPU was and what to expect, if it's against others with the i7 4770 and you only score 58% of that then your result is of course very low. Do they explain that? Can't you give the link to your system or log into the website and save your result and then link it or take a screenshot at it and I'll check.
Multi-core, integer: 248
Multi-core, float: 268
Multi-core, mixed: 262
If these and the quad-core use the same measuring stick as the single-core score then these are very much alike the quad-core ones, but since you have an i7 with hyper-threading which can run eight threads I think these should had been higher. They are also even worse with 39%.
Since average bench is 75% at-least for that that got to be against some other processor, the i7 7700 maybe? Since it seem the i7 4770 in general score at 75% relative whatever model whereas your only do 56.2%.
1)
Save everything on your computer and restart it, hold the delete key down early on and hopefully it should enter the UEFI ("BIOS".)
Enter the AI Tweaker menu.
Under Advanced there exist CPU configuration, go there and check to see that hyper-threading is enabled.
If it's a used machine maybe someone has disabled it because back in the days some games ran worse with it on or maybe someone has told you to disabled it before or so.
Active processor cores just below should say 4.
2)
At a later time you could also check under the AI Tweaker menu for ASUS MultiCore Enhancement and possibly set that on Auto rather than Disabled, or just check what setting it is at and tell us. The i7 4770 is a 3.4 GHz base clock chip but it turbos up to 3.9 GHz at a single-core by default. I don't know if the MCE work on the non-K model but if it do then the expected behavior of it at Auto would be that your processor would clock up to 3.9 GHz even if all cores was used. However ASUS likely boost voltages to make that possible which increases temperatures and it's an auto overclocking feature really. Actually if you have the stock cooler and if it do run the whole processor at 3.9 GHz even when all cores are used this could be one reason for it becoming too hot and then throttling down and performing worse. The solution then would be to disable ASUS MCE.
(Of course save it before you leave / restart =P)
These two settings configure the CPU.
Motherboard / Z97-P:
As for the motherboard the Z97-P is a low-end/step in/budget Z97 board from ASUS so the power delivery / VRM unlikely is the best. You don't have the K-model and as such can't change the multiplier of it / overclock and hence I assume is less likely to need one with good power delivery. Unless MCE runs it at 3.9 GHz. The heat-sink of the VRM seem pretty small and if the VRM become very hot (you could touch the heat-sink while the PC has been doing something heavy for some time if you dare I guess, at your own risk - in case it's very hot) then that too could limit the performance. The solution to that would either had been to have a board with a stronger VRM and larger heat-sinks or just supply more air-flow to them with more case-fans or a fan blowing straight at that heat-sink. I don't know how many fans you've got and of what size.
Software:
If you run MSI Afterburner and that can show CPU clock (not sure, task manager can) and the CPU temperature then you could either play games or run something like prime32 to stress your CPU and then see the CPU temperatures. HW monitor or CPU-Z may log the highest number so that's good enough I guess. What we also want to see though is if your processor clock down to below 3.4 GHz when stressed. The normal task manager in Windows can show your clock under the performance tab. If your machine run at 3.4 GHz or close whatever the all core max turbo is then everything is fine, if it run at 3.9 GHz then MCE is enabled and work. If it run at below 3.4 GHz then it's throttling due to something and perform below it's full performance.
Other hardware: Case fans would lower ambient temperature for all other cooling and hence lower the temperatures, how many and which sizes do you got? The stock CPU cooler is very minimal and with poor case air-flow it may not heat your CPU properly meaning it throttles and lower performance. Do you have the default very low very small aluminium heatsink with black Intel fan on top cooler? Or do you have a better third party cooler?
70 degrees I don't think is a problem.
- The score is indeed about the processor only. If im correct, the 58% is also compared to other users' data. and it might be possible that the average bench indeed shows also against other processors in terms of how the ranks are from the series. however it does not take away that it claims that my processor is performing below average.
- It is indeed enabled.
- I have gone into the BIOS, and it indeeds shows the turbo up to 3.9 GHZ. there is an extra function for overclocking around 4.3 (if i remember well) but that is something my processor is unable to handle, simply not possible.
- I got 2 additional 120mm case fans. my current pc-case is the Corsair Spec-01
Yeah. I assume it mean your performance is below that of other i7 4770s, of course some must be better and some worse and if they perform very much the same that's uninteresting. If your absolute performance rather than the relative one is much lower though then there's a question.
Average for the processor is #69 at 75.4%, the i7 7700K is the reference at 100%.
Average single-core for your processor is 107, quad-core 368 and multi-core 545.
Mixed values averages are 107, 369, 550.
Yours 98.9, 257, 262 which is massively lower. So if everything else was the same that seem wrong.
56.2% of the performance of the 7700K is also much lower than 75.4% of it so something got to be wrong one way or the other.
--
But did your computer have MCE auto or disabled?
(Random thread: https://linustechtips.com/main/topic/568163-force-all-core-max-multiplier-on-non-k-haswell-cpu/)
If MCE is set on auto and if it can actually overclock your all core performance to 3.9 GHz then maybe it's throttling due to heat or power issues. However if MCE is set to disabled and it run as it should according to Intel then that become less likely. The Turbo should be up to 3.9 GHz but not for all cores. If MCE is on I'd disable it and see if that improved things.
--
2 x 120 mm fans I guess would be pretty normal.
Maybe not ok for using MCE if MCE actually do anything with your CPU. No idea if it's enough with the stock CPU cooler even if MCE is disabled. But you did post your temperatures before or didn't you?
I would make sure MCE is disabled and if that doesn't help check if you use the stock cooler or have something better on. If you use the stock cooler I wonder what your CPU temperatures become if you run prime32 or such.
The stock cooler is silly:
http://www.legitreviews.com/images/reviews/2203/4770k-cpu-cooler.jpg
Prime95 + HWmonitor with stock cooler -> 85 degrees: https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?t=1214821
Throttling at 100 degrees: https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?p=25094989&sid=734c2578823a11d341f0c78dd8af1c23#p25094989
Crysis 3 with stock cooler 80 degrees, Intel Extreme Tuning test 100 degrees: https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/core-i7-4770-w-stock-cooler-100-c-during-intel-cpu-stress-test.2328917/
If it's just the stock cooler maybe your processor become too hot. But if you had already explained it doesn't then obviously not.
Assuming you didn't had a bunch of other software running when testing:
If you have high CPU temps then if you have stock cooler get something better. If not maybe it's case air-flow.
If CPU temp are low then I'd guess it's throttling. Maybe CPU speed can show. And if so get better airflow especially on VRM heats sinks or a bit motherboard.
Otherwise no idea.
at 4.2ghz (all cores no turbo) i get 118sc 420.5qc 578.2mc
your multicore (more than 4 cores/threads) is far too low the rest seems about normal
I guess the possbility of having an i5 is limited too if the software says i7 4770.
Or can one disable hyper-threading in Windows? Limit number of cores at-least.
Latest BIOS: http://dlcdnet.asus.com/pub/ASUS/mb/LGA1150/Z97-P/Z97-P-ASUS-2907.zip?_ga=2.68974482.267765348.1512502078-766809827.1505411815
First Google hit seem to suggest one can't disable it from Windows.
Performance could still be lowered for multi-threaded work by reaching some thermal or electrical throttling.