Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
The old stuff people didn't wanted was mouse acceleration or inprecise tracking / guesses from the mouse on how you moved it with faults in it and whatever you could move it so fast that it lost tracking.
The difference between these very best and the very good sensors seem to be something about putting down the mouse at an angle and whatever it may behave weirdly then.
Beyond that he also shake them to see whatever the sensor rattles and prefer light-weight mouse, a cable which doesn't stuck to the mouse pad and have preferences for mouse buttons and scroll wheels.
He list a lot of mice he think is good buys and if you get one of those with a shape and feel you like then I guess you're fine.
336_ vs 338_ or 3390 may not matter very much but the best of them seem to be the 336_. These are all optical sensors, I don't know if theres any laser sensors which is considered as good too. It's mostly just one brand of sensor in the mouses right? One competitor which you see sometimes I think.
G302, 402, 502 can be had for lower prices sometimes because 303, 403, ..