Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
The old stuff people didn't wanted was mouse acceleration or inprecise tracking / guesses from the mouse on how you moved it with faults in it and whatever you could move it so fast that it lost tracking.
The difference between these very best and the very good sensors seem to be something about putting down the mouse at an angle and whatever it may behave weirdly then.
Beyond that he also shake them to see whatever the sensor rattles and prefer light-weight mouse, a cable which doesn't stuck to the mouse pad and have preferences for mouse buttons and scroll wheels.
He list a lot of mice he think is good buys and if you get one of those with a shape and feel you like then I guess you're fine.
336_ vs 338_ or 3390 may not matter very much but the best of them seem to be the 336_. These are all optical sensors, I don't know if theres any laser sensors which is considered as good too. It's mostly just one brand of sensor in the mouses right? One competitor which you see sometimes I think.
G302, 402, 502 can be had for lower prices sometimes because 303, 403, ..