安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
so like i say i see it more as pain then any real help even that maybe to add it as a option and not a must may be good for some
1) one-time password - I already KNOW your password if I hijacked it adding more rediculous paswords doesn't protect anyone
2) password erased restart steam - This function already exists. Uncheck "remember password" in the steam client when you log in
3) Refer to #1
If people have physical acces to your computer, all bets are off. If you can't be bothered to put in screensaver passwords, screen locks or a BIOS password, why does adding yet ANOTHER thing on help in any way.
Use a long secure alpha-numeric password with symbols and both upper and lower case letters and not an actual word or name etc. Activate Steam guard. Use an email provider with 2 step authentication. Don't give out your info to others or other websites.
Your items are perfectly safe as long as your account is.
Firstly, I do not give my Steam password to anyone either, and currently I'm the only one using my account. Secondly, from time to time it happens that I have guests in my home, and those guests have kids who like to play shooters on my Steam account. Now, standing behind their back watching their actions every second would be a) rude and b) tedious, so I'd rather do something else while they play. Granted, those occasions are few and far between and most of the time I don't need this at all, but I'm sure there's lots of people who let other people use their Steam accounts often without giving out their password, so in that context I'm not being selfish to say "if I don't need this, no one needs it either".
This would be a one time password, completely unrelated to Steam account password or the option "remember password", there would be a separate option called, for example, "Inventory management password" that you can set up and use every time you want to delete something, but use once and that's it (at least until you restart Steam).
I know we have enough security features in place, but one more can't hurt, can it?
Yes. There is such a thing as TOO MUCH.
Actually, this possible problem has no other solutions and my suggestion would fix it entirely. Now I'm really starting to wonder if you actually read my suggestion and understood it.
Again, this is an entirely esoteric situation no matter how many 'videos' are out there. Phishing is by far the #1 way your items will disappear. Not because of disgruntled girl friends. So you're already trying to solve a 'problem' that is by definition something that is rare.
Users can already do several things to avoid this, via screen saver passwords, bios passwords, setting steam to not log in on restart, logging off the computer, etc. The assertion that this has 'no other solutions' is totally untrue. It's only because you want to be LAZY about your own security. And security is NOT about being lazy. Your 'problem' can be solved in any number of different ways that do not inconvenice normal users, and such a feature would help so few people as to make the system LESS secure. As users would migrate to simple passwords sine they have to CONSTANTLY keep putting it in.
I realize it's a rare scenario (or bizarre, if you insist) but it certainly isn't impossible.
Besides, it's only a suggestion and you made it abundantly clear what you think of it.
Your opinion is noted. So how about letting others speak now?
Whether it's 'delete', 'trade', 'craft' whatever it still functionally depends on a person having PHYSICAL access to the system. Ergo you're trying to solve a physical security problem. This kind of problem is better solved by again using screensaver passwords, BIOS passwords, logging out of the system, etc.
You also have to look at the impact of what that system would do to real users. You're solving a problem for a tiny esoteric scenrario. In return you are creating a MASSIVE headache for people doing basic trading in teh system. Security is not just about 'throwing barriers up in front of people' because if you do that people invariby make the system less secure because of it. They make their passwords simpler, or they do other things that actually worsen security.
You can't look at systems in a box. They have to be taken into consideration of the overall usage. My point is that the proposed system is highly disruptive to most users, and has a infetesmally small chance of helping the situation it's supposed to fix, when there are plenty of other options users can do to prevent that situation.
Suggest all you want, but don't expect others to not provide a critique of it if there are inherent flaws in what you propose.
YOu asked for it.
You are either completely ignorant of the subject, or trolling hard. Can't decide which.
As a reference, I personally deleted over 25 Dota invites myself. Also, I can delete any item from TF2 and Dota 2 at any point, no matter how valuable they might be (yes, I'm talking about value in real money).
Trust abuse has nothing to do with the physical access. You can entrust someone with the physical access and still have them abuse your trust. It can happen to anyone.
I already said this would only be a separate password for deletion of items, it would have absolutely NO bearing on trading whatsoever. NONE.
This password would not affect your Steam account security and it could be a lot simpler and shorter. Alternatively, to avoid having 2 passwords, Steam password could be used to confirm the deletion of items during a Steam session (until Steam is restarted).
I'm not expecting people to automatically agree, but I do expect them to know something of what they're talking about, and I also expect them to read my suggestion carefully before going full troll mode, like you. I also expect them to post their opinion (positive or negative) and don't saturate the thread by spamming it over and over again, without any additional reasonable arguments, again like you.
Yeah, I asked for opinions. I didn't ask you to spam and troll.
Again your situation still functionally depends physical access to teh system. The scenario necessarily requires physical access. You're looking at the problem the wrong way.
All you'd be doing is pushing these people to trade the items, craft them, etc, instead of deleting them. Again you're not really solving the core problem which is they have physical access to the system. Which is why your system doesn't really solve the core issue. The problem is not 'deleting items' it is 'unauthorized access to your computer'.
I have given you reasonable explanations why your proposed system has significant flaws. Doesn't solve the problem you propose. And that there are better solutions to the problem than a separate password for a single function that doesn't solve teh core problem you're attempting to solve.
Please point out where I am spaming or trolling. I am give you as you indicated an opinion on your proposed system. Which i my opinion is redudnant, unlikely to fix the problem at hand, and has many other solutions which are more effective.
Users are responsible for their account security as well as physical security.