Separate tab for joke/meme reviews
Non-constructive meme/joke reviews should be in its own category. It's frustrating having to sift through many reviews just to find constructive ones.
Zuletzt bearbeitet von Dalek:.; 14. Jan. 2024 um 2:30
< >
Beiträge 111 von 11
You assume users would self-categorize their reviews.
Or AI does it.
Hang in there!

FTC to Hold Informal Hearing on Proposed Rule Banning Fake Reviews and Testimonials February 13, 2024

When Valve's hands are finally forced to act, they'll act or be fined.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Dalek:.:
Or AI does it.
You got to stop assuming AI to be the savior for everything.


Ursprünglich geschrieben von CANCELCULTURE:
Hang in there!

FTC to Hold Informal Hearing on Proposed Rule Banning Fake Reviews and Testimonials February 13, 2024

When Valve's hands are finally forced to act, they'll act or be fined.
Which has nothing to do with OP's request.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von CANCELCULTURE:
Hang in there!

FTC to Hold Informal Hearing on Proposed Rule Banning Fake Reviews and Testimonials February 13, 2024

When Valve's hands are finally forced to act, they'll act or be fined.

First off, it has nothing to do with what the OP suggested....

Second, you do know that is only meant to go after fake reviews and testiminials made up by the sellers of products and people that are paid by the company to make fake reviews and testimonials.

This wouldn't effect anything on steam unless a developer is caught paying people to buy their game and leave a review, or paying people to leave good reviews, which is already something which Valve will ban a developer on Steam for. And has already happened at least a couple of times in the past.




Ursprünglich geschrieben von Dalek:.:
Non-constructive meme/joke reviews should be in its own category. It's frustrating having to sift through many reviews just to find constructive ones.

I'd rather they just ban them and ban the people doing them along with getting rid of the awards which has made the amount of junk reviews like that so much worse.


Ursprünglich geschrieben von Dalek:.:
Or AI does it.

And no, AI is not the thing that will solve everything. A lot of stuff that people think is AI isn't and has been possible for decades.

If you think AI can read a review and decide if its funny or not... it can't. Not even close. All the AIs out there right now, also have HUGE hallucination problems right now.
Zuletzt bearbeitet von Gwarsbane; 14. Jan. 2024 um 8:12
Ursprünglich geschrieben von CANCELCULTURE:
Hang in there!

FTC to Hold Informal Hearing on Proposed Rule Banning Fake Reviews and Testimonials February 13, 2024

When Valve's hands are finally forced to act, they'll act or be fined.
There was also that time there was a hearing to change the value of Pi to 3.2.
Reality and politicians don't always go together.,
Sensible folk understand that there's no way to tell a FAKE from a REAL without scanning the other person's brain.

Humerous reviews can be informative, as can memes some time. And in either case the joke or the meme is just the commentary not the opnion.

The OP could just skim past the reviews they don't carefore. I mean I've personally never had a problem with finding lengthy and or well written reviews.
Zuletzt bearbeitet von Start_Running; 14. Jan. 2024 um 8:12
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Gwarsbane:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Dalek:.:
Or AI does it.

And no, AI is not the thing that will solve everything. A lot of stuff that people think is AI isn't and has been possible for decades.

If you think AI can read a review and decide if its funny or not... it can't. Not even close. All the AIs out there right now, also have HUGE hallucination problems right now.

Ok, maybe not AI but certain filters/algorithm that detects 90% of the review being ASCII characters, 4 word reviews, etc.
Zuletzt bearbeitet von Dalek:.; 14. Jan. 2024 um 8:27
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Dalek:.:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Gwarsbane:



And no, AI is not the thing that will solve everything. A lot of stuff that people think is AI isn't and has been possible for decades.

If you think AI can read a review and decide if its funny or not... it can't. Not even close. All the AIs out there right now, also have HUGE hallucination problems right now.

Ok, maybe not AI but certain filters/algorithm that detects 90% of the review being ASCII characters, 4 word reviews, etc.

Your idea goes live and then hours later people will be beating it by copying and pasting words from some wiki to get past the minimum but keep it low effort. They will also copy and paste a bunch of words from some wiki to get the amount of ascii down to under 90%.... then you want it switched to 80%.... so they change.... then you want it set at 70%.... and they add in more words... and so on and so on....

They could block just extended ascii and people would switch to regular letters and numbers to do the same thing.

Its not even hard to find an ascii image generator and have one made for you using what ever ascii you want.

Do you see the problem with that?

People will do the least amount of effort to bypass limits. If that means copying and pasting a bunch of junk from some random website they will just so they can post the junk they want.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Gwarsbane:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Dalek:.:

Ok, maybe not AI but certain filters/algorithm that detects 90% of the review being ASCII characters, 4 word reviews, etc.

Your idea goes live and then hours later people will be beating it by copying and pasting words from some wiki to get past the minimum but keep it low effort. They will also copy and paste a bunch of words from some wiki to get the amount of ascii down to under 90%.... then you want it switched to 80%.... so they change.... then you want it set at 70%.... and they add in more words... and so on and so on....

They could block just extended ascii and people would switch to regular letters and numbers to do the same thing.

Its not even hard to find an ascii image generator and have one made for you using what ever ascii you want.

Do you see the problem with that?

People will do the least amount of effort to bypass limits. If that means copying and pasting a bunch of junk from some random website they will just so they can post the junk they want.

Good point.
There is not a single review on Ultrakills store page default view that is actually about the game.



Ursprünglich geschrieben von Gwarsbane:
Ursprünglich geschrieben von Dalek:.:

Ok, maybe not AI but certain filters/algorithm that detects 90% of the review being ASCII characters, 4 word reviews, etc.

Your idea goes live and then hours later people will be beating it by copying and pasting words from some wiki to get past the minimum but keep it low effort. They will also copy and paste a bunch of words from some wiki to get the amount of ascii down to under 90%.... then you want it switched to 80%.... so they change.... then you want it set at 70%.... and they add in more words... and so on and so on....

They could block just extended ascii and people would switch to regular letters and numbers to do the same thing.

Its not even hard to find an ascii image generator and have one made for you using what ever ascii you want.

Do you see the problem with that?

People will do the least amount of effort to bypass limits. If that means copying and pasting a bunch of junk from some random website they will just so they can post the junk they want.
Steam is absolutely capable of moderating the review pages and they do it for review bombs. There is no excuse for them to not even try to fix other unusable review pages. This argument does not work because they have gone up against the users on this and won easily before.
Ursprünglich geschrieben von William Shakesman:
There is not a single review on Ultrakills store page default view that is actually about the game.
Really because I found 4. Though granted that review section is an outlier in of itself.
< >
Beiträge 111 von 11
Pro Seite: 1530 50

Geschrieben am: 14. Jan. 2024 um 2:29
Beiträge: 11