Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
Maybe because of this.
Thats part of the reason why this thread exists.
While we dont know for certain it isnt a far reach to assume it's for sexualization of anime girls.
While Clanpool is fan service in nature, there are more sexually explicit games mentioned previously that are for sale on steam. So seeing this one get rejected is inconsistent with what's been approved.
The video someone linked showing "gameplay" is misrepresenting the game. The game itself is a old school dungeon crawler/exploration game.
Whats being shown is a very small portion of the game which is a mini game.
Okay, here's the thing. Doesn't matter how "small" the portion of a game has it, if that bad thing is so close too making adult content of minors it's not going onto the store page.
Lets say you have a game with 100 hours of content and only 1 minute of actual child porn in it. That ♥♥♥♥ is not getting released on Steam.
Look, if it's legally allowed to be sold in America, it shouldn't be an issue.
However, Valve is allowed to say, "No, we will not have it for sale."
And that's that.
They have the legal authority to refuse to sell a game.
And it doesn't matter if it's hit or miss standards for rejecting.
They simply have all the power.
So, at the end of the day, fan service games exist all over, and I Wouldn't worry too much about Valve being inconsistent because of them.
IT's not worth getting gray hair over. :P
Valve does Valve things.
They are akin to Cthulhu and basically hard to fully grasp and stay sane.
He was literally using a hypothetical example!
But these games are all animation. No humans are harmed in the making of these games.
To compare anime to actual crime devalues the severity of the crime.
If someone finds anime, and loli characters in anime disgusting, go ahead. You are entitled to feel that way. But to compare it to a real crime that harms real people is not arguable.
And for the people that would alike it to a gateway drug to something more serious, the same could be said for all violent or sexual media influencing people.
People should have the ability to separate fiction from reality. This is why we have shows and games featuring murder, violence, depictions of abuse, ect.
Yes. Exactly.
Well said.
I wish people would stop confusing the real life issue with cartoons.
Ugh.
That's just digusting.
A similar statement is also in the online conduct guidelines.
This doesn't say "real children". It just says "children". An update to Skyrim that allows you to have sex with the completely fictional children in the game would violate this rule. So that's the baseline. The thing you're talking about is currently against the rules. I know you already understand that, but I wanted to establish it in text.
Here's the reason that's not getting changed: Steam has more reasons to not change that rule than to change it. Sure, there might be a few more games that can publish on Steam, but Steam is already doing fine with those games only being sold on other stores, and there's no version of the news story about that change that makes Steam look good.
What you're saying doesn't matter. Gabe doesn't want to have to testify in Congress that this particular depiction of child sex abuse is ok because it's a cartoon.
Except that isn't a thing ever.
Gabe wouldn't be doing that for any game on Steam, or even attempted to bring on Steam.
Congress doesn't even have the rules on their side to even claim cartoons are real life people.
Which is the only way they'd be asking for Gabe.
Good grief.
You are aware that by comparing the fictional child stuff, of any type to the real traumatizing event, it's offensive to everyone who suffered from it, right?
I'm not trying to be mean, but that's what I don't understand.
That makes no sense.
Everyone knows you can't compare anything in a video game to real life people.
Ever.
It's just dismissing the actual real crime that happens.
No one is doing whatever you're claiming about cartoons.
Do you honestly think Loli is the same thing as a real life adult woman who dresses young and has a petite body type?
Eh?
I hate Loli.