Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Given your gripe is about DLC, how about make it so EA games cannot drop DLC until the game's hit full release and is out of EA first?
They just see them as an mtx cash cow. And so whatever they may lose in sales due to diminished quality, they make up on folks who do buy it given those practices.
I think Early Access and Steam get a bad rap, being it's not those smaller games that i can tell, that are to blame for diminished quality, or otherwise small independent developers, but those who were once know for quality, now a shadow of their former selves.
If you are not prepared to play them as is and accept they may or may never change the solution is simple. Do NOT buy them.
First they figured out they don't need to complete the product, second - they can just release a mediocre product, third - they are the ones who should dictate what gamers need, not the other way around, fourth - they can actively and openly berate gamers on social media... and gamers STILL buy their slop.
Take away EA monetization, and 1) EA will disappear, because that's the entire point of EA and 2) nothing will change, because there's a 1000 other ways to have a fool part with his money that he was lucky to get together with from the beginning.
Personal responsibility is a two way street. It does not simply stop at taking the customers money, as some users here would prefer.
That said I don't think early access causes a decline in game quality, but it definitely provides a lot of incentives and expectations that, as we have seen, many developers are ill-prepared for.
If you really think EA devs are any more honest than AAA devs then I have an unfinished future bridge to sell you
Comparing an action that only requires a Steam account button press vs one that requires involving a financial institution, a steam account and almost guaranteed owner's knowledge with all the safeguards in-between makes absolutely zero logical sense and is a false equivalence.
Over promised. Under delivered. Rushed to release. Too much emphasis on the bottom line than reputation. Get the money now, fix it later.
We don't have a delete button because it would create work for valve. We do have early access because that creates revenue for valve.
I hope this helps.
False-Dichotomy. You can have a AAA EA game you know.
And as for whether or not a game is good. thats subjective.
What's objective is the state of the game in regards to bugs, glitches, content, etc. And as said. at least Early Access games are honest that there games are likely to be horribly glitchy and content lacking.
AAA games.. not so much.
That more sounds like you're just bad at ppicking games for yourself m8.
TThough if you have an issue with EA you're free to ignore them. I mean they only account for like 15% of the steam catalog.
It does not get any CLEARER than:
"Get instant access and start playing; get involved with this game as it DEVELOPS".
"This Early Access game is NOT COMPLETE and MAY OR MAY NOT CHANGE FURTHER. If YOU are not excited to play this game in its CURRENT STATE, then YOU should WAIT to see IF the game progresses further in DEVELOPMENT".
Is waiting a problem?
Do AAA games have the same disclaimer as EAG's? No and why we have games which were abandoned after release, still buggy etc. Mass Effect Andrimeda and Anthem to name two.
YOU adding an EAG to YOUR cart and clicking confirm is a VOLUNTARY action not a mandatory one.
YOU can exclude Early Access games in your preferences so they are not shown to YOU.